The Percentage-of-Completion Method of Accounting for Long-Term Construction Contracts

The Percentage-of-Completion Method of Accounting for Long-Term Construction Contracts According to ARB No. 45 and SOP 81-1 by William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant, Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor

Since I first started in public accounting over thirty years ago, I have witnessed a variety of accounting variations involving the recognition of revenue on long-term construction contracts, even though generally accepted accounting principles is fairly clear and unambiguous regarding its treatment.  I suspect that much of the unsystematic treatment in recognizing revenues on contracts may be the result of a devil-may-care attitude on the part of the contractors themselves.  Understandably, contractors, perhaps out of necessity, are not what I would describe as “effete” or refined.  Many graduated out in the field, in the literal sense of the word, and have often felt a distaste, if not a disdain, for the office side of their business.  

Often their “controllers”, or bookkeepers, more likely, were chosen not for their accounting sophistication but for other criteria, such as familiarity with the prevalent software used in the industry, their subservient attitude and their ability to withstand abuse from their contractor superiors, or their willingness to work for very modest wages.  It is not surprising, then, that they may lack sufficient sophistication to understand the subtle nuances of GAAP regarding long-term construction contracts.  

I have even witnessed certain public accountants lacking sophistication in this specialized area of accounting, even though many of these individuals are certified public accountants.  But construction accounting is a specialized industry, rather unique from all other industries, and, consequently, it is not as shocking to me now as it may have been a number of years ago.  I was raised in a construction family and directed a construction and development company as well as operated as the controller of several construction firms.  Consequently, construction accounting is, so to speak, “in my blood”. 

For those interested, I have written a number of articles on construction accounting.  For a general understanding of the accounting of long-term construction contracts, its methodology and its conceptual basis, please see the article, The Percentage-of-Completion Method of Accounting for Long-Term Construction Contracts According to ARB No. 45 and SOP 81-1.

I sinerely hope that you find the article worthy of your time.  I welcome your comments.  Thank you.

William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant, Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor

Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

2010 Rosenberg Survey of CPA Firms Shows Revenues Flat & Profits Down

The Rosenberg Survey for 2010: National Map Survey of CPA Statistics is available for a mere $450…LOL!  Wait a minute:  I have to run out and buy myself a copy at that price.  What a steal!  It’s worth paying $450 to find out what we already know:  that every other CPA firm is doing as miserably as we are, with no increase in revenues, profits declining, and CPAs and experienced staff looking and begging for work. 

What a surprise!  LOL!  Our country has been in a deep recession and is now supposedly dipping back into another recession.  We are now all too familiar with the term “double dip recession”, as if it were an ice cream goodie with lots of chocolate candy sprinkles on top.  But I don’t like the term “double dip recession” to describe a more permanent, fundamental change transpiring in our economy.  That’s too sugar coated of a description of the underlying reality.  It appears that everyone is too afraid to use the more telling term of what is occurring in our economy.  As you must know by now, if you have been following my blog, I prefer calling things as they are…let the chips fall where they may, I always say….I prefer something more accurate, more real, and more dramatic, like the term, “the return of the great depression“, or for the more vulgar minded among us, “the dung hitting the fan”….

However you wish to characterize what is presently occurring, you do realize that all of this was brought on, no less, by “the generation that followed the greatest generation in America’s history”—that is, us moronic, indulged, and spoiled baby boomers—that naive generation raised on make believe, non-reality TV shows, such as Ozzie and Harriet, Leave It to Beaver, the Donna Reed Show, Make Room for Daddy, and My Three Sons….Perhaps that is why we are so reluctant, so afraid, to characterize the disastrous situation for what it truly is, since it was never scripted by Lucille Ball on I Love Lucy, so we wouldn’t know it even if it bit us.  And maybe it will just go away if we continue to ignore it by calling it by a less threatening name, such as a “double dip” recession, as if we all lived in Pleasantville.  Don’t get me wrong:  I want to live in Pleasantville, too; but I can’t find it on my GPS.

I hate to disillusion all you boys and girls, but what is occurring now ain’t no double dip recession!  If you believe that, then you are still living in Pleasantville, oblivious to the reality that we have been becoming a third world country for a number of years now.  Yes, it’s true.  It’s the result of shipping virtually all manufacturing out of our country; exporting all jobs to and redirecting all investment in China, India, Philippines, Cambodia, et al; shifting all of that wealth from the middle class to the upper class–through massive deficit creating tax cuts for the rich–and all of our investment capital to other countries; eradicating that vast consumer and domestic investment base; and so much more, all upon which a robust national economy thrives.  

How can we be so surprised then that we squandered what our parental generation sacrificed so dearly for us after being raised on fantasy sit-com shows and believing in fatuous Madison Avenue myths all of our lives?!  Yes, we are gullible TV-myth junkies, subscribers to that “trickle down” economics and “Laffer curve” drivel of that great B-actor-President (the greatest TV mythsayer, who in memory was built a golden calf shrine in California, even though he had no memory while President, as you recall).   Many of you would vote for this actor-President again probably because you loved his monkey shines in “Bedtime for Bonzo” or because he hosted Death Valley Days.  Well, he brought you Death Valley Days for real now!

But it wasn’t only him responsible for bringing us Death Valley Days; there were many other mouthpieces of Madison Avenue before and after him spouting those myths:  Marshall Plans for every country in the world; lowering taxes on the rich benefits all of us; NAFTA will result in more employment here in the USA; that deficit spending can go on ad infinitum; that we can afford to be the world police force; that we need to spend $300 billion every year on defense (that industrial-military complex that Republican President, Eisenhower, warned us about) to fight the bogeyman of Communism; etc.  Of course, you all do realize that 95% of Madison Avenue, the wealth of our country, is owned by a mere 5% of the citizens in our country.  That’s right, kiddies, the aristocracy in America is alive and well.

But we are the guilty ones.   We believed in this nonsense.  That if we lowered taxes on the rich, that it would trickle down!  LOL!  That if we embraced NAFTA and exported jobs to countries paying $.25/hour, that it would increase employment here and raise our standard of living…LOL!  That if we allowed illegal immigration to run rampant, that unemployment, medical insurance premiums, cost of education and other social services would not increase…LOL!  And I suspect that Palin and Beck and Limbaugh will be mouth-piecing to all of you now that the only way out of this depression is to lower further–if not eliminate–all corporate taxes, capital gains taxes, and personal income taxes, so that even more goodies will trickle down…LOL!   And I suspect that most Americans–desperate for an easy, immediate, mythical, magical, sit-com solution–will continue to buy into this drivel, believing it to be true…LOL!  In the words of P. T. Barnum:  there’s a sucker born every minute.  Yep.  There sure is.

A robust economy depends upon a growing GNP per capita:  an increase in wealth for each and everyone of us, not just the 5% owning 95% of the nation’s wealth.  Without that spreading of the wealth, where is the base of consumption to fuel the economy and the capital to invest in and grow our own country’s economy, since those 5%-owning-95% are investing in China, India, Philippines, Mexico, and everywhere but here, where the cost of labor is merely $.25/hour.  On the other hand, the 95%-owning-5% of our nation’s wealth would have invested in small businesses in your communities in the USA, if they had the wealth that had been shifted to the top 5% tier over the past few decades.  With the wealth having been redistributed from 95% of our population to the elite 5%, also went all those small businesses in our country that were your clients at your CPA firms.  Haven’t you heard your small business owners crying that they cannot borrow from the banks?  Haven’t you seen the red ink on their P&Ls?  Haven’t you noticed all those storefronts boarded up in your cities?  Those once were small businesses and your clients.  Shame on all of us for being so easily taken in and duped.

We all know what the problem is.  The 5% own our government officials, who need millions—soon billions—to run campaigns to be re-elected.  A democracy has been transformed into a plutocracy, replaced by a totalitarian, multinational corporate state.  Thomas Jefferson believed that a democracy could only survive in a country of small farmers, without that concentration of power and wealth characteristic of a feudal society.  But without the protective eyes of the Anti-Sherman Trust Act, we are now living Orwell’s Animal Farm, where pigs are more equal than other animals.  Our forefathers fought a revolution over a tea tax.  We, on the other hand, are much more civilized and complacent.  Our economy won’t ever be fixed with a complacent constituency believing in the myths promulgated by the multinationals’ machines of propaganda.  After all, don’t they give us NASCAR and pizza?

It’s unfortunate that instead of simply giving a tax holiday to the rich, that our country didn’t provide an incentive to invest in our economy, by offering investment tax credits to those investing in capital assets in our country.  It’s unfortunate that when Slick Willie negotiated NAFTA, he didn’t negotiate a level playing field, particularly on minimum wages and the environment.  It’s unfortunate that Reagan granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants and our government does not have strict immigration laws like Switzerland, France, Germany, and Mexico.  It’s unfortunate that we do not require a balanced budget but allow trillion dollar deficits, which are simply hidden taxes, deferred to future generations.  It’s unfortunate there is money in political campaigns, with the blessing of the Supreme Court, entrenching politicians with too much power, without term limits.  It’s unfortunate that we spent a trillion dollars in Iraq, waging a war to destroy mythical weapons of mass destruction, never found, never having existed.  It’s unfortunate that we spent billions rebuilding Iraq, where 1,200 of the 1,500 construction projects will never be used by the Iraqis, since most were never needed except to fill the coffers of certain contractors.  It’s unfortunate that the GAO cannot account for $8.7 billion of our tax dollars spent in rebuilding Iraq.  It’s unfortunate that many of our cities are going bankrupt, with property taxes driving families out of their homes.  The unfortunates are endless.

I can’t wait for the Rosenberg Survey for 2011, showing not only profits plummeting, but also revenues and hirings.  The only increases you can expect next year is a rise in CPA firms closing their doors and an increase in the number of layoffs of CPAs and accountants.  Hey, kiddies, better shut the boob tube and radio off and stop listening to those Madison Avenue propaganda machines rivaling those of Joseph Goebbels, because we’re in for one heck of a ride in freefall.  Never forget that the banks didn’t collapse until several years after the crash in ’29.  Double dip recession?  Hardly.  It’s the second wave of a tsunami.  Although the first wave of our economic tsunami was large, it will be insignificant compared to the wave that follows, like that second wave of Sumatra, causing appalling scenes of unbelievable destruction.   So it was in 1929 with the first wave crashing the stock market, destroying illusory wealth created by lax margin trading, and then with the second wave, several years later, devastating our entire economy.

Yes, Ebenezer, the ghosts of NAFTA past, and of the Marshall Plan, all that national debt, all those needless wars, and all those billions wasted in Iraq (and elsewhere)—rebuilding prisons where there are not any prisoners—and all that deregulation of banks and Wall Street creating laxity in capital markets,…all those ghosts are now appearing.  It’s going to be one heck of a Scrooge year.  Bah humbug.

Have a tax or an accounting question?  Please feel free to submit it under “Comments” at Accounting, QuickBooks, and Taxes by the Barefoot Accountant.  For information and assistance on any tax and accounting issue, please visit our website:  Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , | Leave a comment

How to Download Transactions Directly into QuickBooks

How to Download Bank Transactions Directly into QuickBooks

Do you wish to save bookkeeping time and expense and minimize errors from erroneously posting entries into QuickBooks?  Then consider setting up online banking in QuickBooks.

Read the article, How to Download Transactions from Your Bank’s Checking Account into QuickBooks, by William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant and Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor, and learn how to set it up with your financial institution and match bank transactions with those already recorded in Quickbooks as well as record unrecorded expenses and deposits in QuickBooks while connected to online banking.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Maximize Your Exclusion of Foreign Earned Income Using the Physical Presence Test

Maximize Your Exclusion of Foreign Earned Income Using the Physical Presence Test

Are you eligible to exclude most, if not all, of your foreign earned income?   Please see chart below:

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion

Many individuals fail to employ the physical presence test in the manner maximizing their exclusion of foreign earned income in the years of arrival to and departure from the foreign country.  Such failure to maximize the exclusion of their foreign earned income can result in thousands of dollars of additional taxes being paid needlessly.

Read the article on how to apply the physical presence test correctly in order to maximize the exclusion of foreign earned income in order to save thousands of dollars in income taxes:  Maximize Your Exclusion of Foreign Earned Income Under the Physical Presence Test.

William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant

Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Carole Romatis (The Gourmet Accountant) Serves “Shrimp Magazine” to Clients at Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC

The Way to a Client’s Wallet is through his Stomach!

Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC: William Brighenti, Certified Public AccountantCarole Romatis, besides being the QuickBooks Guru at Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC, is also the Gourmet Accountant at our firm. (By the term, “gourmet accountant”, I am not in any way implying that she cooks the books as our resident bookkeeper.)  It is Carole’s contention that accounting does not have to be a bland subject; rather, she presents a very compelling case that we accountants can spice it up, making it palatable even to the most quantitatively averse souls. And by “spice it up”, I mean that literally because at our firm, Carole, a true epicurean, prefers to discuss accounting, QuickBooks, taxes, and business over a gourmet meal prepared by her and a glass of vino.  Let’s face it, tax season is long and arduous, trying for the most Spartan of accountants.  And Carole has cooked up a recipe to survive this season of drudgery, as well as the other three seasons, by eating and living well every day, accounting for the extra pounds I added since we teamed up. 

Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC:  The Gourmet Accountant

Today Carole served a very special client of ours “Shrimp Magazine”, named after the street on which the restaurant featuring this dish is located in New Orleans. If you have never eaten Shrimp Magazine, frankly, you have never lived.  This seafood dish is even decadent by New Orleans standards.  It is butterflied shrimp sauteed deliciously in a lavish garlicky butter sauce with artichokes, ham, basil, and green onions, served over cappellini.  The rich butter sauce is what makes the dish so sumptuous; however, if you cannot handle the cholesterol, then salivate and drool as I recount Carole’s recipe to those less inclined to be so timid and cowardly…at least, you can savor it voyeuristically. 

Take three-quarter of a cup of flour.   

Season with kosher salt, black pepper, granulated garlic.  Mix.  

Peel and butterfly a pound of extra large shrimp, and dredge in the seasoned flour.  

Add one stick of butter to a 10? saute pan and heat over medium temperature. 

Add the floured shrimp to the pan.  

Saute the shrimp for a few minutes and then turn them over.  

Add a cup of chopped artichoke hearts and a half of a cup of diced ham.  

Add a third of a cup of white wine and (2) tablespoons of  Worchestershire sauce. 

Sprinkle with granulated garlic, black pepper, and kosher salt. 

Add (2) tablespoons of fresh chiffonade basil and (3) tablespoons of green onions.  

Add (2) cloves of minced garlic.  (Do you know the difference between chiffonade and minced?  I do:  Carole just explained and demonstrated it to me.  She also recommends having all of the ingredients ready before you cook, referred to in French as, mise en place.  Carole is such a show off!)

Stir it all up.  

When the shrimp is done (be careful not to overcook the shrimp, otherwise they will taste rubbery), serve immediately over angel hair pasta.  

Sprinkle with parmigiano reggiano cheese freshly grated.  

Hmmmmmmmmmm.  Mangia! 

Now allow us to ask you:  do you enjoy a gourmet meal with a glass of vino while you review financial statements or tax returns with your clients?  Or do you settle for chips, snacks, and other crud?  Life can be very, very good, if you choose to live it in style.  Carole and I heartily recommend wooing and seducing your clients with a gourmet meal and a glass of vino.  Hey, we’re Italian!  Everything can be an occasion to eat, enjoy, and celebrate life to the fullest.  It works for us:  we have clients drooling at our doors, opening their hearts and their wallets.  More importantly, we relish it as well.  As Carole always says, la dolce vita!  I cannot but agree.  

Have a tasty recipe for Carole?  Have a tax or an accounting question?  Please feel free to submit it under “Comments” at Accounting, QuickBooks, and Taxes by the Barefoot Accountant.  For information and assistance on any tax and accounting issue, please visit our website:  Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC.  


If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose. The above tax advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the accounting practice of the publisher and any transaction described herein. The taxpayer recipients of this offering memorandum should seek tax advice based on their particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Using QuickBooks Online for Property Management Accounting

Using QuickBooks Online for Property Management Accounting

Using QuickBooks Online for Property ManagementUsing QuickBooks Online for your property management accounting may be a solution for your property management needs. Often the individuals collecting the rents, undertaking the bookkeeping, purchasing materials or hiring subcontractors, and providing the investment funding are in different locations but all need access to the accounting records of the properties. By using QuickBooks Online and appropriately regulating the permissions of the various users, QuickBooks Online may offer an effective, low cost, solution to the needs of the key members of the management team of rental properties. 

Read the article, Using QuickBooks Online for Property Management Accounting, for more information. 

William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant, Certified QuickBook…

Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Small Business Jobs Tax Relief Act of 2010 Offers Tax Deductions and Incentives to Small Businesses

House of Representatives Passes Small Business Jobs Tax Relief Act of 2010The Small Business Jobs Tax Relief Act of 2010, introduced and sponsored by Representative Sander Levin of Michigan, was passed on June 15, 2010, by the House of Representatives primarily along party lines by a recorded vote of 247 to 170. The bill is now on its way to the Senate where its fate is anyone’s guess, since an earlier bill passed in March by the House containing many of the same tax provisions as contained in this bill was subsequently defeated there.

Of particular note are two tax provisions encouraging the investment in small businesses and enhancing their cash flows in their critical formative years. First of all, the Small Business Jobs Tax Relief Act of 2010 would increase the exclusion from gross income from 50% to 100% of the gain from the sale or exchange of “qualified small business” stock acquired after March 15, 2010, and before January 1, 2012.  In general, qualified small businesses are certain C corporations with aggregate gross assets not in excess of $50 million.

Secondly, the tax deduction for trade or business start-up expenditures would increase from $5,000 to $20,000 in the years 2010 and 2011.

The other provisions currently contained in the Bill going before the Senate include the following:

  1. The penalty for failure to disclose a reportable transaction would be limited to 75% of the decrease in tax resulting from such transaction, thereby offering penalty relief to small businesses.
  2. The bill would create a Small Business Borrower Assistance Program that would provide assistance to small businesses that are struggling to meet their obligations to creditors. The bill would exclude from gross income any amounts that are received under this program.
  3. The bill would provide an exception to the “at-risk” rules for non-recourse loans that are guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (SBA).
  4. Rules for valuing assets in grantor retained annuity trusts would be expanded to require that the right to receive fixed amounts from an annuity last for a term of not less than 10 years, that such fixed amounts would not decrease during the first 10 years of the annuity term, and that the remainder interest must have a value greater than zero when transferred.
  5. Any processed fuel with significant acid numbers would be excluded from eligibility for any tax credit of alcohol used as fuel.
  6. Estimated tax installments for certain large corporations in the third quarter of 2015 would increase by 7.75%.

The total estimated revenue effects to small businesses over the next ten years will be tax incentives totaling $3.6 billion, with nearly $2 billion resulting from the temporary exclusion of the 100% of gain from the sale of certain small business stock, $940 million resulting from treatment of certain nonrecourse small business investment company loans from the Small Business Administration as amounts at risk, and $500 million resulting from the increase in the amount allowed as a deduction for start-up expenditures.

This article is provided for informational purposes and is not intended to be construed as legal, accounting, or other professional advice. For further information, please consult appropriate professional advice from your attorney and certified public accountant.

Have a tax or an accounting question? Please feel free to submit it under “Comments” at Accounting, QuickBooks, and Taxes by the Barefoot Accountant. For information and assistance on any tax and accounting issue, please visit our website: Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Are you aware of the possible $7,621 in tax benefits available under the HIRE Act for each newly hired employee?

Thinking of hiring new employees? The HIRE Act enacted on March 18, 2010 allows employers to be exempt from their share of social security taxes on wages paid from then until the end of the years as well as to take a tax credit of as much as $1,000 for each qualified employee retained for a year.

 To find out the details of the HIRE Act and the claiming of these two tax benefits, please see the article, “The HIRE ACT: Obtain $1,000 + 6.2% of Wages for New Employees Hired“. 

William Brighenti, CPA 

Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Why isn’t the Internal Revenue Code written in English? Have you read IRC Section 45R yet on the health care tax credit?

IRC Section 45d - as clear as mudWhy does the Internal Revenue Code read as clear as mud?  It must be deliberate.  I’m not complaining, because it’s good for my business as a Certified Public Accountant.  Let’s face it, if the average person could understand the tax code, why would they pay us $150/hour to do their taxes and resolve their tax issues?

But the FASBs, GASBs, APBs, SEC pronouncements, etc., don’t read any better.  Leave it to attorneys and others on the FASB, AICPA, SEC, and in the Department of Treasury to muddy the waters always.  Like Delphic oracles of antiquity, these supreme bodies of accounting and taxation have a reputation for issuing statements veiled in ambiguity and incomprehensibility to the uninitiated, keeping tax attorneys and certified public accountants—the high priestesses of the accounting and tax mysteries—gainfully employed.   At times I feel that one has to be a biblical exegesis scholar in order to be able to interpret some of their esoteric pronouncements. 

Need an example?  Have you read Section 45R of the Code on the new health care tax credit enacted into law on March 23, 2010?

(a) General rule. For purposes of section 38 , in the case of an eligible small employer, the small employer health insurance credit determined under this section for any taxable year in the credit period is the amount determined under subsection (b) .
(b) Health insurance credit amount. Subject to subsection (c) , the amount determined under this subsection with respect to any eligible small employer is equal to 50 percent (35 percent in the case of a tax-exempt eligible small employer) of the lesser
of—
(1) the aggregate amount of nonelective contributions the employer made on behalf of its employees during the taxable year under the arrangement described in subsection (d)(4) for premiums for qualified health plans offered by the employer to its employees through an Exchange, or
(2) the aggregate amount of nonelective contributions which the employer would have made during the taxable year under the arrangement if each employee taken into account under paragraph (1) had enrolled in a qualified health plan which had a premium equal to the average premium (as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) for the small group market in the
rating area in which the employee enrolls for coverage.
(c) Phaseout of credit amount based on number of employees and average wages. The amount of the credit determined under subsection (b) without regard to this subsection shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the sum of the following amounts:
(1) Such amount multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of full-time equivalent employees of the employer in excess of 10 and the denominator of which is 15.
(2) Such amount multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which is the average annual wages of the employer in excess of the dollar amount in effect under subsection (d)(3)(B) and the denominator of which is such dollar amount.

Don’t you just love it when these pronouncements fail to complete a thought without referring the reader to another section (or subsection, or sub-subsection) to understand what it is saying?  First the reader is informed that the credit is the amount determined under subsection (b).  Then in (b), the reader discovers that it is subject to subsection (c).  And then in (c), it is referred to subsection (d)(3)(B).  I feel as a reader that I can never catch up to what the pronouncement is attempting to say.  Perhaps it would make more sense by reading the Code from the end of the particular Section and working one’s way backwards. 

My mother used to scold me in this fashion, always reprimanding me while referring to an earlier incident, and to another one before that one, and the one before the one before the earlier incident, and so on, until I had no idea why she was scolding me in the first place!  Don’t you just hate that?!

Incidentally, for anyone interested in understanding Section 45R on the health care tax credit—which is why I ruined my Memorial Day weekend in the first place—please see my article, How to Calculate the Health Care Tax Credit, so you don’t ruin your Memorial Day weekend, too.

This article is provided for informational purposes and is not intended to be construed as legal, accounting, or other professional advice.  For further information, please consult appropriate professional advice from your attorney and certified public accountant. 

Have a tax or an accounting question?  Please feel free to submit it under “Comments” at Accounting, QuickBooks, and Taxes by the Barefoot Accountant.  For information and assistance on any tax and accounting issue, please visit our website:  Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC.

If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose. The above tax advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the accounting practice of the publisher and any transaction described herein. The taxpayer recipients of this offering memorandum should seek tax advice based on their particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ann “Curvy” Curry should have eaten her wheaties before delivering a commencement address at Wheaton College

Ann “Curvy” Curry may have been “wearing a very fabulous blue and white outfit” underneath her robe, as she mentioned in her commencement address at Wheaton College the other day, but one can only wonder what was underneath her graduation cap.

As you all must know by now, in her commencement address to more than 400 graduates of Wheaton College in Norton, Massachusetts, in a feeble attempt to connect with the graduating students, she mentioned famous alumni of Wheaton College, including Billy Graham, Wes Craven, Todd Beamer, and Dennis Hastert.  Oh, Oh, Ann.  Oops, major faux pas!  “Holy Crap!”, as Frank Barrone would say.  None of these gentlemen graduated nor even attended that College.  They attended the private Evangelical Protestant, coeducational, liberal arts college in Wheaton, Illinois, also named Wheaton College.  Would someone please show Annie how to google!  Has she been hanging out with Sarah Palin?

What should have been so obvious about her gaffe, making it even more embarrassing, was that when Graham and Hastert were students, Wheaton College was strictly a female college.  Oh boy!  She not only confused the two colleges, but apparently she may not even have known that Wheaton College had been a leading college for women and only became co-educational in 1988.  Is it conceivable that the female recipient of an honorary doctorate from Wheaton, a leading woman in journalism, was oblivious to these facts before making a commencement address to this very prestigious College, formerly regarded as one of the top liberal arts colleges for women?!  Maybe Annie should have paid more attention to the content of her speech and less to that fabulous blue and white outfit underneath her robe.  Did I mention that her eyeliner and makeup were flawless at the commencement?

What makes this incident funnier is that Annie gave an almost identical commencement speech a week before in Providence, Rhode Island, where she was awarded yet another honorary degree for her success in journalism, using the same mommie-dearest jokes, etc.; here, however, she did have enough smarts not to confuse this college with Wheaton, appropriately substituting the name “Providence” for “Wheaton” in perfect mail merge synchronicity, and instead of wearing a blue and white outfit underneath her robe, she wore a black and white dress underneath her gown in stylish color coordination to the school’s colors.  Always the woman of Vogue!  Did I mention that her eyeliner and makeup were flawless at this commencement as well?

Equally as amusing as Annie’s gaffe was the fact that all of the graduates appeared oblivious to her faux pas: there was not an “ah” or “oops” or “snicker” audible after her litany of the Illinois college alumni.  One can only wonder if they had all sobered up for commencement?!  So much for the $200,000 price tag for a college education at Wheaton.

Finally, crescendoing this entire commencement address into a hilarious farce was Wheaton College’s subsequent attempt of a Curry-Gate cover up, editing the video and text of Annie’s commencement address by removing the gaffe and scrubbing it off the internet (it can be found, by the way, at http://www1.whdh.com/video/player/?clipId=4809762).  Now let me ask you, is that intellectual honesty?  Is that journalism at its best, reporting what truthfully occurred, after awarding this television icon in journalism an honorary doctorate for her achievements in that field?  LOL!  The irony is precious.  I couldn’t make this stuff up!  I would have awarded her an honorary doctorate in flawless eyeliner and makeup techniques, for sure.

NBC hired an attractive, very leggy news woman, currently paying her a reported $3,000,000 per year salary.  I’m fat and balding, and AccountingWEB doesn’t pay me a shekel.  Maybe if I had her legs…?

I did enjoy her speech, though.  There were memorable phrases as, “The key is to be ready”….yeah, Ann, as you were the other day! 

And let us not forget the unforgettable boast, bursting with bravado:  “And to everyone who says to you along the way that you cannot do something…, the thing you should have in your mind is, ‘Oh, yeah? Watch me.'”  We watched you, Ann.  And you sure did it!

I also relish these lines:  “More than luck, talent, or even brainpower, determination is the trait…And the best part is that unlike talent and luck and brainpower, determination is what you can choose to have.”  But doesn’t brainpower help, Ann.  It certainly would have helped you the other day.  You quoted your mother as saying, “college is stupid”.  No, Annie, college is not stupid; people are stupid.  Hello?

And last but not least, here are lines that I will take with me to my grave:  “To you I say, it is only with adversity that we even have a chance at greatness. Adversity is your opportunity.”  Did you mean “controversy” here instead of “adversity”, Annie?  They do sound similar, and they rhyme!  Hmmm.  Perhaps Wheaton edited this line, too. 

And if, as you claim, Annie, “adversity is your opportunity”, you certainly have plenty of opportunities ahead.  Perhaps you could return to being a cocktail waitress?  Or marry a rich guy, as your mother advised you.  You do have great legs, Ann.  (As if we haven’t noticed by now, Annie.)

If you really want to turn all of this adversity about Wheaton into an opportunity, here’s a suggestion (better do it before Tina Fey beats you to it!):  call up your sister show, SNL – Saturday Night Live, appear on the show as Ann Curvy Curry, wear a micro mini, or–better yet–a fabulous blue and white outfit purchased at Victoria’s Secret, apply the “racoonish” eyeliner your mommie accused you of wearing, and give the commencement speech all over again, but this time include, among its famous alumni, Alvin and the Chipmunks, and Rin Tin Tin….Please don’t be mortified….I screw up everyday, Annie.  But I just laugh it off.  It’s all about recognizing that we are only human, not gods and goddesses, Annie.

This article is provided for informational purposes and is not intended to be construed as legal, accounting, or other professional advice.  For further information, please consult appropriate professional advice from your attorney and certified public accountant. 

Have a tax or an accounting question?  Please feel free to submit it under “Comments” at Accounting, QuickBooks, and Taxes by the Barefoot Accountant.  For information and assistance on any tax and accounting issue, please visit our website:  Accountants CPA Hartford, LLC.

If and only to the extent that this publication contains contributions from tax professionals who are subject to the rules of professional conduct set forth in Circular 230, as promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury, the publisher, on behalf of those contributors, hereby states that any U.S. federal tax advice that is contained in such contributions was not intended or written to be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer for such purpose. The above tax advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the accounting practice of the publisher and any transaction described herein. The taxpayer recipients of this offering memorandum should seek tax advice based on their particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor .

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged | Leave a comment