<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Barefoot Accountant on Accounting, QuickBooks, Taxes, Money, and Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Barefoot Accountant on Accounting, Taxes, QuickBooks, &#38; American Politics....the Truth, the Whole Truth, &#38; Nothing but the Truth!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by tina</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-7910</link>
		<dc:creator>tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-7910</guid>
		<description>Im in the same situation you are in it happend to me last year owing over 1000.00 to my escrow and now this year my homeowners insurance is going up again but allstate already sent my mortgage company what insurance will be for the coming up year and it is not even the same as what Allstate sent me. So there for my escrow will be short for next year as well then I&#039;ll end up owing even more money next year.  Nothing you can really do about it but pay them there money.  If I were you I would make sure you watch every statement for your mortgage account and your allstate account to make sure there taking out enough.  Good luck to you and your family on the American dream. Ive lost all faith in this company and the American Dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im in the same situation you are in it happend to me last year owing over 1000.00 to my escrow and now this year my homeowners insurance is going up again but allstate already sent my mortgage company what insurance will be for the coming up year and it is not even the same as what Allstate sent me. So there for my escrow will be short for next year as well then I&#8217;ll end up owing even more money next year.  Nothing you can really do about it but pay them there money.  If I were you I would make sure you watch every statement for your mortgage account and your allstate account to make sure there taking out enough.  Good luck to you and your family on the American dream. Ive lost all faith in this company and the American Dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by tina</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-7909</link>
		<dc:creator>tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-7909</guid>
		<description>I have both homeowners and car insurance for the past 3 years our homeowners insurance has gone way way up what is the deal with this I don&#039;t understand how Allstate can get away with doing this to people.  The American dream of owning a home has become a nightmare. If I would had know what I know now I sure would&#039;nt have got myself into this mess of owning a home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both homeowners and car insurance for the past 3 years our homeowners insurance has gone way way up what is the deal with this I don&#8217;t understand how Allstate can get away with doing this to people.  The American dream of owning a home has become a nightmare. If I would had know what I know now I sure would&#8217;nt have got myself into this mess of owning a home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rich and the Rest of Us:  a Poverty Manifesto. Video and transcript. by Jeff 4 Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5322&#038;cpage=1#comment-7904</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff 4 Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 19:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5322#comment-7904</guid>
		<description>The problem with TYT and Smiley &amp; West is they continue to stubbornly resist alternative parties. I&#039;ve asked Smiley &amp; West about this face to face at their events and they resist the idea. 

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. 

PS: Loved your  21 reasons why I will not vote for Obama in 2012 post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with TYT and Smiley &amp; West is they continue to stubbornly resist alternative parties. I&#8217;ve asked Smiley &amp; West about this face to face at their events and they resist the idea. </p>
<p>Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. </p>
<p>PS: Loved your  21 reasons why I will not vote for Obama in 2012 post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to fix our American economy and create more jobs?  A 19 point progressive program to stop the hemorrhaging of our country&#8217;s life blood! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607&#038;cpage=1#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>No, I would not replace our government with a Communistic system:  that is a totalitarian system of government, similar to what we have now.  Instead of a Communistic state, we have a Corporate State, the collusion of huge multinational corporations buying and controlling our government.

I advocate Jeffersonian democracy and Adam Smith&#039;s economic philosophy from his Wealth of Nations.  Jefferson asserted that there could be no democracy with concentrations of power (i.e., wealth) in the hands of the few.  He believed that democracy could only survive in a country of small farmers; today, it would be small businesses, who, incidentally, create 80% of the jobs in our country and do not export them to Taiwan, South Korea, China, and elsewhere.

Adam Smith warned of the collusion of business and government, too, and the disastrous effect it would have on a free enterprise, capitalistic system.

Perhaps you failed to read the Federalist Papers and Wealth of Nations, and obtain all of your information from Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, accounting for your misunderstanding of the economic reality currently in the United States.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I would not replace our government with a Communistic system:  that is a totalitarian system of government, similar to what we have now.  Instead of a Communistic state, we have a Corporate State, the collusion of huge multinational corporations buying and controlling our government.</p>
<p>I advocate Jeffersonian democracy and Adam Smith&#8217;s economic philosophy from his Wealth of Nations.  Jefferson asserted that there could be no democracy with concentrations of power (i.e., wealth) in the hands of the few.  He believed that democracy could only survive in a country of small farmers; today, it would be small businesses, who, incidentally, create 80% of the jobs in our country and do not export them to Taiwan, South Korea, China, and elsewhere.</p>
<p>Adam Smith warned of the collusion of business and government, too, and the disastrous effect it would have on a free enterprise, capitalistic system.</p>
<p>Perhaps you failed to read the Federalist Papers and Wealth of Nations, and obtain all of your information from Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, accounting for your misunderstanding of the economic reality currently in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to fix our American economy and create more jobs?  A 19 point progressive program to stop the hemorrhaging of our country&#8217;s life blood! by Clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607&#038;cpage=1#comment-7891</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 18:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607#comment-7891</guid>
		<description>So what I got out of that Sun is that you would replace our Democratic Republic with a modern hybrid combining Socialism and Communism but minus any civil morals and taking the worst from both systems.

Aside from that about 99% of what you said either has nothing to do with governing people or simply could not be accomplished in reality

You make statements like &quot;humane and workable set of values and principles.&quot; but then outlines ways to underline the very morals and values of the people of the country you are proposing the change for.

I would not only not vote for you I would openly fight against you, I can see a lot of things wrong with most governments but it almost always has to do with scope and size. 

Your idea of government would do away with any pretense of moral beliefs and would basically be a pointless control center taxing a populace that would not agree with its reason for being nor would they gain anything from the governing body. 

Good luck selling that because not even in the most extreme socialist countries like Britian or Germany could you close that deal

Ps - &quot;Why do nations like Taiwan, Japan and South Korea have better health care systems than the US?&quot; They don&#039;t their health care is a joke compared to the US, stop believing what the liberal media is selling you. Visit them first hand and see, same as Britian, Germany and just about any other country in the world that has some form of social medicine

&quot;This would elevate voter participation to a level that would leave little time for football games and Friday nights at the local bowling alley or bar&quot;

No actaully it would end voter particpation completely because if people wanted to run every aspect of the country they woudl do it not elect someone else</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what I got out of that Sun is that you would replace our Democratic Republic with a modern hybrid combining Socialism and Communism but minus any civil morals and taking the worst from both systems.</p>
<p>Aside from that about 99% of what you said either has nothing to do with governing people or simply could not be accomplished in reality</p>
<p>You make statements like &#8220;humane and workable set of values and principles.&#8221; but then outlines ways to underline the very morals and values of the people of the country you are proposing the change for.</p>
<p>I would not only not vote for you I would openly fight against you, I can see a lot of things wrong with most governments but it almost always has to do with scope and size. </p>
<p>Your idea of government would do away with any pretense of moral beliefs and would basically be a pointless control center taxing a populace that would not agree with its reason for being nor would they gain anything from the governing body. </p>
<p>Good luck selling that because not even in the most extreme socialist countries like Britian or Germany could you close that deal</p>
<p>Ps &#8211; &#8220;Why do nations like Taiwan, Japan and South Korea have better health care systems than the US?&#8221; They don&#8217;t their health care is a joke compared to the US, stop believing what the liberal media is selling you. Visit them first hand and see, same as Britian, Germany and just about any other country in the world that has some form of social medicine</p>
<p>&#8220;This would elevate voter participation to a level that would leave little time for football games and Friday nights at the local bowling alley or bar&#8221;</p>
<p>No actaully it would end voter particpation completely because if people wanted to run every aspect of the country they woudl do it not elect someone else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>Our banker has decided that he wants all of our loan information broken down into short term/long term/interest/principal etc so I found your article on the loan manager, which I really like and now use, however, I ran into the problem that was stated about the most common error is not posting the payment through the loan manager.  I back started it for January 1st 2012 and of course we have already made 4 payments this year so then when I tried to go through the loan manager to show the payments were made, they are all double posted.  Help!!  Thanks, Wendy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our banker has decided that he wants all of our loan information broken down into short term/long term/interest/principal etc so I found your article on the loan manager, which I really like and now use, however, I ran into the problem that was stated about the most common error is not posting the payment through the loan manager.  I back started it for January 1st 2012 and of course we have already made 4 payments this year so then when I tried to go through the loan manager to show the payments were made, they are all double posted.  Help!!  Thanks, Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Rich and the Rest of Us:  a Poverty Manifesto. Video and transcript. by The Rich and the Rest of Us: a Poverty Manifesto. Video and &#8230; &#124; Money Controller</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5322&#038;cpage=1#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rich and the Rest of Us: a Poverty Manifesto. Video and &#8230; &#124; Money Controller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5322#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>[...] The Rich and the Rest of Us: a Poverty Manifesto. Video and &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged accountant, america, cornel, cornel-west, obama, poverty, president, rabbi, smiley, uygur, white by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Rich and the Rest of Us: a Poverty Manifesto. Video and &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged accountant, america, cornel, cornel-west, obama, poverty, president, rabbi, smiley, uygur, white by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Watch The Barefoot Accountant livestream daily.  Call in or start chatting to discuss taxes, politics, accounting, QuickBooks, small business and personal finances. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5300&#038;cpage=1#comment-7867</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5300#comment-7867</guid>
		<description>Dear Vic,

Thank you for your comment and support.  But be assured:  many are very disenchanted with Obama&#039;s sell out of the working classes of America.  And I suspect that he may very well lose the election, even though Willard Mitt Romney is his opponent, given that a recession and higher energy prices are expected soon.

You can piss down peoples&#039; backs and tell them it&#039;s raining outside only so many times.  Eventually, everyone gets pissed off. 

Thanks, again,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Vic,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment and support.  But be assured:  many are very disenchanted with Obama&#8217;s sell out of the working classes of America.  And I suspect that he may very well lose the election, even though Willard Mitt Romney is his opponent, given that a recession and higher energy prices are expected soon.</p>
<p>You can piss down peoples&#8217; backs and tell them it&#8217;s raining outside only so many times.  Eventually, everyone gets pissed off. </p>
<p>Thanks, again,<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Watch The Barefoot Accountant livestream daily.  Call in or start chatting to discuss taxes, politics, accounting, QuickBooks, small business and personal finances. by Vic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5300&#038;cpage=1#comment-7859</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5300#comment-7859</guid>
		<description>Be it only you and I; genuinely appreciated is your enumerating to account the 325 Sell-OUT$ by the thus far No Account President in deep NAP at the helm. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be it only you and I; genuinely appreciated is your enumerating to account the 325 Sell-OUT$ by the thus far No Account President in deep NAP at the helm. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nontaxable wages of volunteer firefighters and emergency medical responders by BETTY PELLETIER</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2171&#038;cpage=1#comment-7793</link>
		<dc:creator>BETTY PELLETIER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2171#comment-7793</guid>
		<description>has this been extended?  I have never claimed it and have been on an ambulance service for over 30 years. I see it was in effect from 2007 to 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has this been extended?  I have never claimed it and have been on an ambulance service for over 30 years. I see it was in effect from 2007 to 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Matt Taibbi discusses his recent article, Bank of America:  Too Crooked to Fail, on Democracy Now, March 22, 2012.  Video with review. by Matt Taibbi discusses his recent article, Bank of America: Too &#8230; &#124; Money Controller</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5233&#038;cpage=1#comment-7765</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Taibbi discusses his recent article, Bank of America: Too &#8230; &#124; Money Controller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5233#comment-7765</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt Taibbi discusses his recent article, Bank of America: Too &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged aaa, california, king, libor, loans, march-22, private, united by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt Taibbi discusses his recent article, Bank of America: Too &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged aaa, california, king, libor, loans, march-22, private, united by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JOBS:  Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.  Legalizing Fraud in the Stock Market.  Interview of Matt Taibbi by Eliot Spitzer on Viewpoint, Current TV, April 9, 2012.  Video and Transcript. by JOBS: Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Legalizing Fraud in the &#8230; &#124; Money Controller</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5258&#038;cpage=1#comment-7749</link>
		<dc:creator>JOBS: Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Legalizing Fraud in the &#8230; &#124; Money Controller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5258#comment-7749</guid>
		<description>[...] JOBS: Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Legalizing Fraud in the &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged accounting, business, central, connecticut, eliot-spitzer, master, obama, president, public, state, street, taibbi by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JOBS: Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act. Legalizing Fraud in the &#8230;   This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged accounting, business, central, connecticut, eliot-spitzer, master, obama, president, public, state, street, taibbi by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-7694</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-7694</guid>
		<description>Our mortgage company just informed us that Allstate is raising our homeowners insurance over 50%...from $1,308 in 2011 to $2,012 in 2012...resulting in a large escrow shortage.  Allstate hasn&#039;t bothered to call or send notice of this fact or attempt to explain the large increase. We have been an Allstate customer for 26 years but this is going to mark the end of that relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our mortgage company just informed us that Allstate is raising our homeowners insurance over 50%&#8230;from $1,308 in 2011 to $2,012 in 2012&#8230;resulting in a large escrow shortage.  Allstate hasn&#8217;t bothered to call or send notice of this fact or attempt to explain the large increase. We have been an Allstate customer for 26 years but this is going to mark the end of that relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should Progressives now fall in line behind President Obama just because an election is coming up? by Elise Mattu</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5120&#038;cpage=1#comment-7672</link>
		<dc:creator>Elise Mattu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5120#comment-7672</guid>
		<description>I am not sure where you figure out that the Health Care Act is 50% good. Good for who? Maybe for parents who have corporate jobs and can keep Susie and Johnny on their policy till those kids are age 26. That is one perk. And it is good that people cannot be denied Health Insurance because of pre-existing situations.
But for the majority of Americans, who&#039; re already living pay check to paycheck, it is going to be difficult to pay for it. As you get older, if you don&#039;t work for a Big Corporation, you are simply priced out of health insurance. Ditto if you  have pre-existing conditions.  The insurers have to take you and your pre-existing conditions - but they charge you through the nose for the privilege.
Have you had a loved one who is sick and who relies on you while they are sick? Do you understand that since no one near the WH cared enough about the public option to have it written in to the plan, that people are going to find that not only are they going to pay  exorbitant amounts  for health insurance, they are still going to spend  hours  on the phone discussing with insurers whether or not the loved one can have the treatment they need. 
Or not.  And yes, there is supposed to be a way for the government to subsidize people to help them with insurance costs - but people also have to come up with the money for co-pays and often 20% of the cost of treatments &amp; procedures. 
I have never figured out why this nation&#039;s people are stuck with this utter mess. In France, half as much money per capita is spent on people - and the French are better taken care of. We spend more money and end up with very lousy care.  Believe me on that one. I have spent nineteen years in the trenches doing private duty nursing assistant work - and although Big Insurers will allow a person to have quadruple by-pass heart surgery, they won&#039;t sign off on paying $ 6,000 for the meds to keep the person free of infection after the operation. 
So a person endures all the stress and trauma that  the operation entails; the surgeons and hospital get between 85K and 135 K - and the person ends up dying because they don&#039;t have any infection fighting meds  offered!!  Or they get the meds, but end up losing their home, as they have to pay out of pocket costs on the medicines. That is just one out of fifty other horror scenarios I can describe  for  you.
I am 59 yrs old, and have survived one medical bankruptcy.  My spouse and I continually debate the wisodom of leaving this country and moving somewhere civilized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure where you figure out that the Health Care Act is 50% good. Good for who? Maybe for parents who have corporate jobs and can keep Susie and Johnny on their policy till those kids are age 26. That is one perk. And it is good that people cannot be denied Health Insurance because of pre-existing situations.<br />
But for the majority of Americans, who&#8217; re already living pay check to paycheck, it is going to be difficult to pay for it. As you get older, if you don&#8217;t work for a Big Corporation, you are simply priced out of health insurance. Ditto if you  have pre-existing conditions.  The insurers have to take you and your pre-existing conditions &#8211; but they charge you through the nose for the privilege.<br />
Have you had a loved one who is sick and who relies on you while they are sick? Do you understand that since no one near the WH cared enough about the public option to have it written in to the plan, that people are going to find that not only are they going to pay  exorbitant amounts  for health insurance, they are still going to spend  hours  on the phone discussing with insurers whether or not the loved one can have the treatment they need.<br />
Or not.  And yes, there is supposed to be a way for the government to subsidize people to help them with insurance costs &#8211; but people also have to come up with the money for co-pays and often 20% of the cost of treatments &amp; procedures.<br />
I have never figured out why this nation&#8217;s people are stuck with this utter mess. In France, half as much money per capita is spent on people &#8211; and the French are better taken care of. We spend more money and end up with very lousy care.  Believe me on that one. I have spent nineteen years in the trenches doing private duty nursing assistant work &#8211; and although Big Insurers will allow a person to have quadruple by-pass heart surgery, they won&#8217;t sign off on paying $ 6,000 for the meds to keep the person free of infection after the operation.<br />
So a person endures all the stress and trauma that  the operation entails; the surgeons and hospital get between 85K and 135 K &#8211; and the person ends up dying because they don&#8217;t have any infection fighting meds  offered!!  Or they get the meds, but end up losing their home, as they have to pay out of pocket costs on the medicines. That is just one out of fifty other horror scenarios I can describe  for  you.<br />
I am 59 yrs old, and have survived one medical bankruptcy.  My spouse and I continually debate the wisodom of leaving this country and moving somewhere civilized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damning Report: Obama And The Grand Bargain.  Cenk Uygur video Current TV March 20, 2012 by Vic Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5147&#038;cpage=1#comment-7554</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5147#comment-7554</guid>
		<description>Thank you for Defiant DESISTANCE Against burgeoning Baracquiescence among the &quot;professional left&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for Defiant DESISTANCE Against burgeoning Baracquiescence among the &#8220;professional left&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Damning Report: Obama And The Grand Bargain.  Cenk Uygur video Current TV March 20, 2012 by Josh Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5147&#038;cpage=1#comment-7546</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5147#comment-7546</guid>
		<description>I saw this posted at Daily Kos and was not surprised that it attracted the kind of derision and cult of personality responses so typical of authoritarian-minded Kossacks.  Dear Leader makes Bush look good by comparison and what do so-called liberals do?  Cling to Obama&#039;s pants even tighter.  Sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this posted at Daily Kos and was not surprised that it attracted the kind of derision and cult of personality responses so typical of authoritarian-minded Kossacks.  Dear Leader makes Bush look good by comparison and what do so-called liberals do?  Cling to Obama&#8217;s pants even tighter.  Sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strictly Chimneys, LLC:  Our Client, Mike Panzarella, is interviewed by Fox News as an expert on chimney repairs by Wyatt K</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4909&#038;cpage=1#comment-7513</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4909#comment-7513</guid>
		<description>I checked my sent e-mails and I sent a complaint about Lysco on Jan. 16, 2012 to the Dept. of Consumer Protection.  And, they did nothing about it.  Notice that the Maine Attorney General and also Massachusetts are at least making efforts to take on Lysco.  Connecticut is doing nothing to discourage these scammers.  I used the Dept. of Consumer Protection&#039;s own complaint form and sent it with the following e-mail message:

&quot;I appreciate the Dept. of Consumer Protection being there for us consumers.  However, I have to say that it is pretty bad that the Dept. extends Home Improvement licenses to businesses like Lysco Contracting AKA Energy Star without at least doing a cursory search.  It took me all of two minutes to find out these are chimney sweep scammers AND YOUR DEPARTMENT LICENSED THEM!

We did not fall for the scam, but my mother almost did.  I just think that a preliminary look online would have revealed to your Department that these people are scammers.  I am blown away that you would extend them a license.&quot;

I e-mailed this along with a formal complaint form to trade.practices@ct.gov.  I guess that did a lot of good.  I notice Lysco still has an active license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked my sent e-mails and I sent a complaint about Lysco on Jan. 16, 2012 to the Dept. of Consumer Protection.  And, they did nothing about it.  Notice that the Maine Attorney General and also Massachusetts are at least making efforts to take on Lysco.  Connecticut is doing nothing to discourage these scammers.  I used the Dept. of Consumer Protection&#8217;s own complaint form and sent it with the following e-mail message:</p>
<p>&#8220;I appreciate the Dept. of Consumer Protection being there for us consumers.  However, I have to say that it is pretty bad that the Dept. extends Home Improvement licenses to businesses like Lysco Contracting AKA Energy Star without at least doing a cursory search.  It took me all of two minutes to find out these are chimney sweep scammers AND YOUR DEPARTMENT LICENSED THEM!</p>
<p>We did not fall for the scam, but my mother almost did.  I just think that a preliminary look online would have revealed to your Department that these people are scammers.  I am blown away that you would extend them a license.&#8221;</p>
<p>I e-mailed this along with a formal complaint form to <a href="mailto:trade.practices@ct.gov">trade.practices@ct.gov</a>.  I guess that did a lot of good.  I notice Lysco still has an active license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strictly Chimneys, LLC:  Our Client, Mike Panzarella, is interviewed by Fox News as an expert on chimney repairs by Wyatt K</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4909&#038;cpage=1#comment-7504</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4909#comment-7504</guid>
		<description>I notified the Connecticut Dept. of Consumer protection about this &quot;company&quot; back in January and even telephoned their office to let them know they were preying on the elderly here in Connecticut.  I also sent a written complaint to the Dept. of Consumer protection.  They did nothing despite my telling them that they gave a home improvement license to a group of scammers.  Had the state taken my complaint more seriously, this woman, and I don&#039;t know how many others, might not have been scammed.  They nearly did it to my mother, but I had the foresight to do some research about them.  I also notified the local police in several towns near mine and I notified some local newspapers.  I knew this was coming back in January, but no one gave much attention when I first tried to bring it to the forefront...  The state is just interested in collecting fees to issue licenses.  They have no incentive or desire to protect its citizens from these thieves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notified the Connecticut Dept. of Consumer protection about this &#8220;company&#8221; back in January and even telephoned their office to let them know they were preying on the elderly here in Connecticut.  I also sent a written complaint to the Dept. of Consumer protection.  They did nothing despite my telling them that they gave a home improvement license to a group of scammers.  Had the state taken my complaint more seriously, this woman, and I don&#8217;t know how many others, might not have been scammed.  They nearly did it to my mother, but I had the foresight to do some research about them.  I also notified the local police in several towns near mine and I notified some local newspapers.  I knew this was coming back in January, but no one gave much attention when I first tried to bring it to the forefront&#8230;  The state is just interested in collecting fees to issue licenses.  They have no incentive or desire to protect its citizens from these thieves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans love socialism&#8230;socialism for corporations, that is! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2447&#038;cpage=1#comment-7485</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 05:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2447#comment-7485</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment, Pat.  True:  the Republicans are hypocrites, favoring gimmes and tax loopholes and subsidies for multinational corporations but opposing any relief for the American middle class.  Over the past thirty years, the invisible hand of competition has become so invisible that it no longer exists.  What we are now left with is a corporate totalitarian state, with virtually no competition in the marketplace.

However, Barack Obama has not changed the way Washington works.  Over the past three years, the big banks, Wall Street, the multinational corporations, and corporate America have continued to regulate and control the American economy, further inhibiting competition in the marketplace and real capitalism as envisioned by Adam Smith.  Wall Street controls Barack Obama, too:  it is no coincidence that on his first day in office, he appointed Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers as well as reappointed Ben Bernanke and Peter Orszag to his top economic team.  Recall that Goldman Sachs (also known as Government Sachs) was Obama&#039;s largest single donor in his election in 2008.

It is a sad state of affairs when the American citizen has only the choice between a Wall Streeter with very conservative social views and a Wall Streeter with less conservative social views.

The American middle class is screwed either way with whoever is elected President in 2012.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment, Pat.  True:  the Republicans are hypocrites, favoring gimmes and tax loopholes and subsidies for multinational corporations but opposing any relief for the American middle class.  Over the past thirty years, the invisible hand of competition has become so invisible that it no longer exists.  What we are now left with is a corporate totalitarian state, with virtually no competition in the marketplace.</p>
<p>However, Barack Obama has not changed the way Washington works.  Over the past three years, the big banks, Wall Street, the multinational corporations, and corporate America have continued to regulate and control the American economy, further inhibiting competition in the marketplace and real capitalism as envisioned by Adam Smith.  Wall Street controls Barack Obama, too:  it is no coincidence that on his first day in office, he appointed Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers as well as reappointed Ben Bernanke and Peter Orszag to his top economic team.  Recall that Goldman Sachs (also known as Government Sachs) was Obama&#8217;s largest single donor in his election in 2008.</p>
<p>It is a sad state of affairs when the American citizen has only the choice between a Wall Streeter with very conservative social views and a Wall Streeter with less conservative social views.</p>
<p>The American middle class is screwed either way with whoever is elected President in 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans love socialism&#8230;socialism for corporations, that is! by Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2447&#038;cpage=1#comment-7476</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2447#comment-7476</guid>
		<description>The GOP has done little except to prove that socialism is needed because of the failure of democracy through predatory capitalism. Their folly lies in the lack of substance of their beliefs in that ignoring wholesale poverty, or granting socialism to corporations, imaginary democracy cannot survive. The hypocrisy is too great. Predatory capitalism, or free trade, has done little except to disenfranchise employees, alienate voters, and create a poverty America has never known in its history, as opposed to the prosperity democracy and capitalism promises as its greatest strength.

It isn&#039;t rocket science; the GOP is a walking testimony of how oligarchy works. The lines are bright and lit for the public to choose which side of the line they are on, which team....the poor or the rich. Most people choose neither, and choose socialism for salvation. If the GOP can&#039;t offer alternatives that work, why should Americans not reelect Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP has done little except to prove that socialism is needed because of the failure of democracy through predatory capitalism. Their folly lies in the lack of substance of their beliefs in that ignoring wholesale poverty, or granting socialism to corporations, imaginary democracy cannot survive. The hypocrisy is too great. Predatory capitalism, or free trade, has done little except to disenfranchise employees, alienate voters, and create a poverty America has never known in its history, as opposed to the prosperity democracy and capitalism promises as its greatest strength.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t rocket science; the GOP is a walking testimony of how oligarchy works. The lines are bright and lit for the public to choose which side of the line they are on, which team&#8230;.the poor or the rich. Most people choose neither, and choose socialism for salvation. If the GOP can&#8217;t offer alternatives that work, why should Americans not reelect Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s income tax bill favors the rich. It places Connecticut’s deficit on the backs of the middle class. Is Dannel Malloy positioning himself right of center because of future political aspirations? by jean</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906&#038;cpage=1#comment-7464</link>
		<dc:creator>jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906#comment-7464</guid>
		<description>Governor Malloy. I know this has nothing to do with the above article, but I could not find any place else to post this...you asked a question a few weeks ago, &quot; How can we get more people to vistit our state....Idea.....lower the taxes on oil (gas). That should lower the cost about .50 cent per gallon. To fill my tank today and it was 11 gallons,  not a big tank when you think of it,  but 11 gallons at $3.96 per gallon cost me $42.46.  If you lowered the tax, it would have only been $38.06 a saving of $4.40, a gallon of milk,  or a half of a movie ticket, or $4.00 more on a tip.  Something else would have been bought with the extra money.

Thats the point, something else would have been purchased somewhere else in the Town.  More money equals more spending.

So the market is going up but everything else is still too high in price.  If fuel is to high no one will visit the State we live in...I know this year like last year, We will not be  going to any of the Fairs in the state because it just costs to much to do so.

$.50 cents, would that be to much to ask ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Malloy. I know this has nothing to do with the above article, but I could not find any place else to post this&#8230;you asked a question a few weeks ago, &#8221; How can we get more people to vistit our state&#8230;.Idea&#8230;..lower the taxes on oil (gas). That should lower the cost about .50 cent per gallon. To fill my tank today and it was 11 gallons,  not a big tank when you think of it,  but 11 gallons at $3.96 per gallon cost me $42.46.  If you lowered the tax, it would have only been $38.06 a saving of $4.40, a gallon of milk,  or a half of a movie ticket, or $4.00 more on a tip.  Something else would have been bought with the extra money.</p>
<p>Thats the point, something else would have been purchased somewhere else in the Town.  More money equals more spending.</p>
<p>So the market is going up but everything else is still too high in price.  If fuel is to high no one will visit the State we live in&#8230;I know this year like last year, We will not be  going to any of the Fairs in the state because it just costs to much to do so.</p>
<p>$.50 cents, would that be to much to ask ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An email to Warren Buffett to run for President of the United States by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5051&#038;cpage=1#comment-7338</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5051#comment-7338</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Please see the blog entry above:  I emailed Warren Buffett&#039;s office yesterday.

Thank you,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Please see the blog entry above:  I emailed Warren Buffett&#8217;s office yesterday.</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An email to Warren Buffett to run for President of the United States by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5051&#038;cpage=1#comment-7337</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 19:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5051#comment-7337</guid>
		<description>Has Mr Buffett been contacted about a third party run?  Have any national polls been conducted? Your ideas that he would be an ideal alternative to the Dems and Republicans I share. We need Congressional reforms of their perks, entitlement reforms of SS and Medicare which Buffett could do better than anyone. It is not too late for him to accept one of the existing third parties registered in all 51 states. I think he would win. Many liberals like myself who supported Obama before are disillusioned that he will ever be able to balance the budget or carry out the reforms needed to save our country. I know Mr Buffett is a patriot who would no turn down a draft, if we could mount one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Mr Buffett been contacted about a third party run?  Have any national polls been conducted? Your ideas that he would be an ideal alternative to the Dems and Republicans I share. We need Congressional reforms of their perks, entitlement reforms of SS and Medicare which Buffett could do better than anyone. It is not too late for him to accept one of the existing third parties registered in all 51 states. I think he would win. Many liberals like myself who supported Obama before are disillusioned that he will ever be able to balance the budget or carry out the reforms needed to save our country. I know Mr Buffett is a patriot who would no turn down a draft, if we could mount one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An email to Warren Buffett to run for President of the United States by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5051&#038;cpage=1#comment-7321</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=5051#comment-7321</guid>
		<description>I failed to add that Warren Buffett has that voice of inspiration, reminiscent of a Franklin Roosevelt.  Middle Class America needs that voice so desperately today.  I only wish that Mr. Buffett would read my email.  I regard him in the same way that I regard Senator Bernie Sanders, Alan Grayson, and Russ Feingold:  with sincere admiration, trust, and respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I failed to add that Warren Buffett has that voice of inspiration, reminiscent of a Franklin Roosevelt.  Middle Class America needs that voice so desperately today.  I only wish that Mr. Buffett would read my email.  I regard him in the same way that I regard Senator Bernie Sanders, Alan Grayson, and Russ Feingold:  with sincere admiration, trust, and respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>Brenda,
 
So sorry to hear about your experience.  All I can say is, wow.
 
Imagine not standing behind one&#039;s product.  Whatever happened to the phrase, the customer is always right?
 
If I were you, I would not keep silent about your experience.

Please keep me informed.
 
Kindest regards,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brenda,</p>
<p>So sorry to hear about your experience.  All I can say is, wow.</p>
<p>Imagine not standing behind one&#8217;s product.  Whatever happened to the phrase, the customer is always right?</p>
<p>If I were you, I would not keep silent about your experience.</p>
<p>Please keep me informed.</p>
<p>Kindest regards,<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>William,

I called that office and they were no help what so ever!  The woman who I spoke to said too much time had gone by and they will not reduce the price or issue a refund at this point.  I’m in so much trouble now I have purchased 2 tax software packages that I cannot afford. I’ll let you know if I make any headway.  

Brenda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,</p>
<p>I called that office and they were no help what so ever!  The woman who I spoke to said too much time had gone by and they will not reduce the price or issue a refund at this point.  I’m in so much trouble now I have purchased 2 tax software packages that I cannot afford. I’ll let you know if I make any headway.  </p>
<p>Brenda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>Hi Brenda,

I am sorry to hear about your unfortunate experience with Lacerte; however, since it is a product of Intuit, I cannot say that I am not surprised.

You may wish to contact Brad Smith, the President of Intuit.  Here is the address for the Office of the President. 

Intuit, Inc.
OOP (Office of the President) 
P.O. Box 28867 
Tucson, AZ 85726-8857 

520-901-3280

Good luck.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brenda,</p>
<p>I am sorry to hear about your unfortunate experience with Lacerte; however, since it is a product of Intuit, I cannot say that I am not surprised.</p>
<p>You may wish to contact Brad Smith, the President of Intuit.  Here is the address for the Office of the President. </p>
<p>Intuit, Inc.<br />
OOP (Office of the President)<br />
P.O. Box 28867<br />
Tucson, AZ 85726-8857 </p>
<p>520-901-3280</p>
<p>Good luck.<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Brenda</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>William,

I am having a terrible time with Lacerte and read your blog.  Any advice on how to get my money back?  I want to switch back right now.  Please help if you have any advice.  I want to go back to ProFx.  They refused to cancel my contract and threatened to let it go to collections.  I cannot afford to buy both programs this year.  

Thanks,
Brenda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,</p>
<p>I am having a terrible time with Lacerte and read your blog.  Any advice on how to get my money back?  I want to switch back right now.  Please help if you have any advice.  I want to go back to ProFx.  They refused to cancel my contract and threatened to let it go to collections.  I cannot afford to buy both programs this year.  </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Brenda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Intuit&#8217;s Ethics Questionable?  Am I the Only Moron When It Comes to Downloading, Licensing, and Paying for Intuit&#8217;s Tax Software, ProSeries? by JOHN</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1787&#038;cpage=1#comment-7301</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1787#comment-7301</guid>
		<description>I would be using creative solutions UltraTax if I could afford it.  The whole suite of products can drastically reduce prep time and increase profit margins if you have the business size to support it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be using creative solutions UltraTax if I could afford it.  The whole suite of products can drastically reduce prep time and increase profit margins if you have the business size to support it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Donna L. Loeffler, CPA</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7269</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna L. Loeffler, CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7269</guid>
		<description>I have a very small practice.  I am just starting out and I am in southeastern MN.  A new client came in to my office and asked me to prepare his 2011 taxes.  He had started his electrical contracting business in 2010 and filed his own taxes on Turbo Tax.  He selected accrual accounting method because he maintained an inventory of parts that he billed to his clients.

I spent many hours researching the Rev Procs for the 3115 form.  It was daunting.  I went out to TaxAlmanac.org and the IRS website.  But, when I came across your article, all the pieces of the puzzle seemed to fall into place. I still have a few pieces of the puzzle to wrap up, but the task seems much more manageable after reading your article.  I thank you very much for sharing.  Words just can&#039;t express...

-- 
Donna
Donna L. Loeffler, CPA
936 Church Avenue
St. Charles, MN 55972</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a very small practice.  I am just starting out and I am in southeastern MN.  A new client came in to my office and asked me to prepare his 2011 taxes.  He had started his electrical contracting business in 2010 and filed his own taxes on Turbo Tax.  He selected accrual accounting method because he maintained an inventory of parts that he billed to his clients.</p>
<p>I spent many hours researching the Rev Procs for the 3115 form.  It was daunting.  I went out to TaxAlmanac.org and the IRS website.  But, when I came across your article, all the pieces of the puzzle seemed to fall into place. I still have a few pieces of the puzzle to wrap up, but the task seems much more manageable after reading your article.  I thank you very much for sharing.  Words just can&#8217;t express&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Donna<br />
Donna L. Loeffler, CPA<br />
936 Church Avenue<br />
St. Charles, MN 55972</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should corporate taxes be lowered when the effective tax rate of corporations is only 12.1%? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4974&#038;cpage=1#comment-7268</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4974#comment-7268</guid>
		<description>What Americans should see from that chart on the change in federal tax revenues is this:  that the big corporations have transferred their tax obligations as employers onto their employees.  While corporate taxes in total as a percentage of federal tax revenues have decreased dramatically, payroll taxes as a percentage of federal tax revenues have skyrocketed, just as employers have transferred the cost of medical insurance and retirement benefits onto their employees.

Now do you understand why middle class Americans can no longer afford a home and a college education for their children?

When will you stand up and demand real change?  President Obama has just proposed a 20% reduction in the corporate tax rate.  He is as guilty as all those Republicans demanding decreases in corporate taxes.

Let&#039;s realize that our politicians are representing corporate America and not the American citizens since money controls elections and their livelihood.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Americans should see from that chart on the change in federal tax revenues is this:  that the big corporations have transferred their tax obligations as employers onto their employees.  While corporate taxes in total as a percentage of federal tax revenues have decreased dramatically, payroll taxes as a percentage of federal tax revenues have skyrocketed, just as employers have transferred the cost of medical insurance and retirement benefits onto their employees.</p>
<p>Now do you understand why middle class Americans can no longer afford a home and a college education for their children?</p>
<p>When will you stand up and demand real change?  President Obama has just proposed a 20% reduction in the corporate tax rate.  He is as guilty as all those Republicans demanding decreases in corporate taxes.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s realize that our politicians are representing corporate America and not the American citizens since money controls elections and their livelihood.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7256</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7256</guid>
		<description>There are several methods of preparing a WIP (Work-in-Process) Schedule.  The most common is cost-to-cost.  Compare estimated costs to actual costs.  If there is a subsequent loss in any contract price, it is recognized immediately on the income statement.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several methods of preparing a WIP (Work-in-Process) Schedule.  The most common is cost-to-cost.  Compare estimated costs to actual costs.  If there is a subsequent loss in any contract price, it is recognized immediately on the income statement.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Sridhar Vemuri</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7255</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Vemuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7255</guid>
		<description>Hi ,

I have an interesting question -  there might not be a Right or Wrong answer -  but I was faced with this situation in one of my companies -  If you can give your thought and advise what you think is more correct -  appreciate your answer -  
 
Academic question  - 
 
Valuation of WIP in Airline Maintenance &amp; Repair &amp; Overhaul organizations ( MROs&#039; ).
  
Facts: 
 
Generally work is undertaken in the MRO&#039;s after the repair work is identified and costs agreed to complete the job. Work starts only after the repair rates are agreed upon between the two parties - the owner and the service provider
 
Query:
 
For WIP valuation, should one use the costs or the selling rate.
  
 
As a conservative practice, we value the closing stock or the WIP at cost or realisable value , whichever is lower. The reason is simple -  the sale has not taken place and these goods are to be sold at a later date -  so the axiom of conservativeness applies - 
 
However if, as in the MRO business, the sale of the service is already done, and the maintenance is in progress, should not the value be expressed at the selling price instead of at cost? The rationale being that the sale has already taken place and there are no more selling expenses needed to complete the sale. By this method there is fairness and also the profits are being recognized proportionately.. 
 
In my opinion, the conservative thinking of valueing at cost price was the right thing to do  - but the Company had a Global Policy to value WIP at selling price -  The Big 4 accepted this policy -  may be because of the above reasoning  -  I did not question the policy -  could not -  but tried to reason out the thinking !! How would you look at this ---- 
 
 
Kind regards
 
Sridhar Vemuri
 

Chartered Accountant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,</p>
<p>I have an interesting question &#8211;  there might not be a Right or Wrong answer &#8211;  but I was faced with this situation in one of my companies &#8211;  If you can give your thought and advise what you think is more correct &#8211;  appreciate your answer &#8211;  </p>
<p>Academic question  &#8211; </p>
<p>Valuation of WIP in Airline Maintenance &amp; Repair &amp; Overhaul organizations ( MROs&#8217; ).</p>
<p>Facts: </p>
<p>Generally work is undertaken in the MRO&#8217;s after the repair work is identified and costs agreed to complete the job. Work starts only after the repair rates are agreed upon between the two parties &#8211; the owner and the service provider</p>
<p>Query:</p>
<p>For WIP valuation, should one use the costs or the selling rate.</p>
<p>As a conservative practice, we value the closing stock or the WIP at cost or realisable value , whichever is lower. The reason is simple &#8211;  the sale has not taken place and these goods are to be sold at a later date &#8211;  so the axiom of conservativeness applies &#8211; </p>
<p>However if, as in the MRO business, the sale of the service is already done, and the maintenance is in progress, should not the value be expressed at the selling price instead of at cost? The rationale being that the sale has already taken place and there are no more selling expenses needed to complete the sale. By this method there is fairness and also the profits are being recognized proportionately.. </p>
<p>In my opinion, the conservative thinking of valueing at cost price was the right thing to do  &#8211; but the Company had a Global Policy to value WIP at selling price &#8211;  The Big 4 accepted this policy &#8211;  may be because of the above reasoning  &#8211;  I did not question the policy &#8211;  could not &#8211;  but tried to reason out the thinking !! How would you look at this &#8212;- </p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
<p>Sridhar Vemuri</p>
<p>Chartered Accountant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by Donna</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>My homeowners went from $766 a year to $1389! That&#039;s almost double!!! Just because I live 6 miles from my fire department. I live in Tennessee and have been with Allstate for 30 years! This is just plain wrong! I think the Insurance companies have too much power. I think our Congressmen need to look into this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My homeowners went from $766 a year to $1389! That&#8217;s almost double!!! Just because I live 6 miles from my fire department. I live in Tennessee and have been with Allstate for 30 years! This is just plain wrong! I think the Insurance companies have too much power. I think our Congressmen need to look into this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strictly Chimneys, LLC:  Our Client, Mike Panzarella, is interviewed by Fox News as an expert on chimney repairs by Robert Capelleti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4909&#038;cpage=1#comment-7216</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Capelleti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4909#comment-7216</guid>
		<description>I got a call from a chimney cleaning company recently.  They said it would only cost $60, when the going rate is more likely three times that amount!  To me it sounded like the old bait-and-switch scam, to get one&#039;s foot in the door in order to discover something seriously wrong with my chimney, scare the holy bejesus out of me about the likelihood of dying from carbon monoxide poisoning, and then hooking me with a big repair job and a huge bill, costing thousands of dollars.  This is the oldest scam around.   And 80 year-old ladies are perfect pigeons, aren&#039;t they.

When the representative of the company involved here said that its work was all in accordance with the building code, then how come there wasn&#039;t clearance of 18&quot; from combustibles?  Old wood could go up in flames from spontaneous combustion, killing the inhabitants in the house. 

I would never go to an 80 year-old lady&#039;s house on the pretext of cleaning her chimney, and then have her write me a check for $5,400 for major repair work without first giving her ample time to discuss it with a family member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a call from a chimney cleaning company recently.  They said it would only cost $60, when the going rate is more likely three times that amount!  To me it sounded like the old bait-and-switch scam, to get one&#8217;s foot in the door in order to discover something seriously wrong with my chimney, scare the holy bejesus out of me about the likelihood of dying from carbon monoxide poisoning, and then hooking me with a big repair job and a huge bill, costing thousands of dollars.  This is the oldest scam around.   And 80 year-old ladies are perfect pigeons, aren&#8217;t they.</p>
<p>When the representative of the company involved here said that its work was all in accordance with the building code, then how come there wasn&#8217;t clearance of 18&#8243; from combustibles?  Old wood could go up in flames from spontaneous combustion, killing the inhabitants in the house. </p>
<p>I would never go to an 80 year-old lady&#8217;s house on the pretext of cleaning her chimney, and then have her write me a check for $5,400 for major repair work without first giving her ample time to discuss it with a family member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7185</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7185</guid>
		<description>[We removed name and email address to protect the confidentiality of the individual]

Basis is typically based on what you have invested and re-invested in any investment.  So it appears that you have sufficient basis to deduct any losses, particularly in the first year.  Your Certified Public Accountant normally computes and updates your basis each year, since the calculation is a function of a number of items, including contributions and distributions and income.

Your tax liability is based on the S Corporation&#039;s income and other pass through items.  Is the $20k/month distribution a salary?

My fee is typically one-third of my competitors in the area.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant
Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[We removed name and email address to protect the confidentiality of the individual]</p>
<p>Basis is typically based on what you have invested and re-invested in any investment.  So it appears that you have sufficient basis to deduct any losses, particularly in the first year.  Your Certified Public Accountant normally computes and updates your basis each year, since the calculation is a function of a number of items, including contributions and distributions and income.</p>
<p>Your tax liability is based on the S Corporation&#8217;s income and other pass through items.  Is the $20k/month distribution a salary?</p>
<p>My fee is typically one-third of my competitors in the area.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant<br />
Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Removed</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator>Removed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7183</guid>
		<description>I bought, Jan 2011, an S corporation. The corporation is a home health care agency. The purchase price was 2,ooo,ooo.oo (two million) dollars. I paid 1.7 million up front and have a long-term loan for the remaining 300,000.00 at eight per cent. 
   I live in Jerusalem, Israel and the s corporation is in Florida. I am not taking a salary. 
   1) How do I figure my &quot;basis&quot; for the first year?
   2) My distribution for the first year is 20K per month with 11K going to pay the long term loan, so what is my tax liability.
   3)  What is your fee for filing my tax returns for this first year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought, Jan 2011, an S corporation. The corporation is a home health care agency. The purchase price was 2,ooo,ooo.oo (two million) dollars. I paid 1.7 million up front and have a long-term loan for the remaining 300,000.00 at eight per cent.<br />
   I live in Jerusalem, Israel and the s corporation is in Florida. I am not taking a salary.<br />
   1) How do I figure my &#8220;basis&#8221; for the first year?<br />
   2) My distribution for the first year is 20K per month with 11K going to pay the long term loan, so what is my tax liability.<br />
   3)  What is your fee for filing my tax returns for this first year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on $26 billion mortgage settlement:  too little, too late.  President Barack Obama:  Wall Street&#8217;s man in government? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4844&#038;cpage=1#comment-7181</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4844#comment-7181</guid>
		<description>I contacted Janell Ross to interview her on this story.  I am seeking certain evidence to substantiate the events purported by Mrs. Zapata, specifically, the form of confirmation received from the bank evidencing that the second application was received on time, any bank document requiring the Zapata&#039;s to pay $400 per hour for mediation, the terms of modification of the mortgage proposed by the Zapatas in relation to the market value of the originally-valued $500,000 home, as evidenced in the sale on August 3rd, etc.  What appears to be missing in this account of Mrs. Zapata&#039;s attempt to modify her mortgage are the details of her offer to the bank.  Was the offer credible based on the facts?  Was the offer reasonable in light of current market conditions?

I wonder if the American people are likely to feel more sympathetic to families losing their $100,000 or $200,000 homes than to those losing their $500,000 or $5,000,000 homes to banks.

Yes, Cenk, the devil is in the details.  In my opinion more details on the Zapata&#039;s story are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I contacted Janell Ross to interview her on this story.  I am seeking certain evidence to substantiate the events purported by Mrs. Zapata, specifically, the form of confirmation received from the bank evidencing that the second application was received on time, any bank document requiring the Zapata&#8217;s to pay $400 per hour for mediation, the terms of modification of the mortgage proposed by the Zapatas in relation to the market value of the originally-valued $500,000 home, as evidenced in the sale on August 3rd, etc.  What appears to be missing in this account of Mrs. Zapata&#8217;s attempt to modify her mortgage are the details of her offer to the bank.  Was the offer credible based on the facts?  Was the offer reasonable in light of current market conditions?</p>
<p>I wonder if the American people are likely to feel more sympathetic to families losing their $100,000 or $200,000 homes than to those losing their $500,000 or $5,000,000 homes to banks.</p>
<p>Yes, Cenk, the devil is in the details.  In my opinion more details on the Zapata&#8217;s story are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7177</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7177</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your Kudo&#039;s!!!

And thank you for your suggestion regarding the crediting to the Note Payable account.  I will check it out.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your Kudo&#8217;s!!!</p>
<p>And thank you for your suggestion regarding the crediting to the Note Payable account.  I will check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Mike Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7176</guid>
		<description>Thank You for your web page describing Quickbooks Loan Manager. I was able to set up my loan quickly and correctly. Before finding your site I was confused and ready to give up on using the loan manager. The only &quot;iffy&quot; section is where you say &quot;Next record the loan in quickbooks, crediting the total dollar amount to the Note Payable account&quot; I got it, but I wasn&#039;t sure I was doing it right until it all worked out. I just felt uncomfortable since the earlier commentary was step by step, and this segment skipped quickly past that.

Kudo&#039;s for a great Help site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You for your web page describing Quickbooks Loan Manager. I was able to set up my loan quickly and correctly. Before finding your site I was confused and ready to give up on using the loan manager. The only &#8220;iffy&#8221; section is where you say &#8220;Next record the loan in quickbooks, crediting the total dollar amount to the Note Payable account&#8221; I got it, but I wasn&#8217;t sure I was doing it right until it all worked out. I just felt uncomfortable since the earlier commentary was step by step, and this segment skipped quickly past that.</p>
<p>Kudo&#8217;s for a great Help site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7175</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7175</guid>
		<description>Dear John,

I believe both vendors, QuickBooks and Peachtree, allow free trials or demos of their products.  I suggest you try out both and determine which one feels most comfortable to you.

Of course, if you have a small business, I suggest that you obtain the services of a CPA to assist you.  If you do not have one, my fees are about one-third of my competitors in the Connecticut area.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;William Brighenti, CPA
Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John,</p>
<p>I believe both vendors, QuickBooks and Peachtree, allow free trials or demos of their products.  I suggest you try out both and determine which one feels most comfortable to you.</p>
<p>Of course, if you have a small business, I suggest that you obtain the services of a CPA to assist you.  If you do not have one, my fees are about one-third of my competitors in the Connecticut area.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">William Brighenti, CPA<br />
Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by John</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7174</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7174</guid>
		<description>William, 
Thanks for your response. Do you also have any idea between Quickbooks and Peachtree, which product be (1) best suited for my type of business and (2) allow me to prepare reports that would be accepted by banks and investors for getting financing?

I don&#039;t own either product so I am in the market to purchase one. Again, my business is a very small finance company where I plan to buy inheritances at a discount; do factoring (i.e., buying invoices at a discount); and make limited small commercial/consumer loans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,<br />
Thanks for your response. Do you also have any idea between Quickbooks and Peachtree, which product be (1) best suited for my type of business and (2) allow me to prepare reports that would be accepted by banks and investors for getting financing?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t own either product so I am in the market to purchase one. Again, my business is a very small finance company where I plan to buy inheritances at a discount; do factoring (i.e., buying invoices at a discount); and make limited small commercial/consumer loans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

Unfortunately QuickBooks nor Peachtree will automatically prepare financial statements and footnote disclosures in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).  Intuit has a Statement Writer; Peachtree has a Financial Statement Editor.  Plus Crystal Reports is included with Peachtree Premium, allowing greater flexibility in creating financial reports.

But before preparing financial statements and footnotes you need to understand GAAP and the required disclosures.  No program will provide that knowledge for you.

Whatever program in which you are most comfortable working perhaps might be your choice of software.  And if you need official financial statements, unless you are a trained accountant, I humbly suggest you always engage a good CPA.  I learned long ago that when it comes to doing something ordinarily requiring years of study, hire a professional and save headaches and money.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>Unfortunately QuickBooks nor Peachtree will automatically prepare financial statements and footnote disclosures in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).  Intuit has a Statement Writer; Peachtree has a Financial Statement Editor.  Plus Crystal Reports is included with Peachtree Premium, allowing greater flexibility in creating financial reports.</p>
<p>But before preparing financial statements and footnotes you need to understand GAAP and the required disclosures.  No program will provide that knowledge for you.</p>
<p>Whatever program in which you are most comfortable working perhaps might be your choice of software.  And if you need official financial statements, unless you are a trained accountant, I humbly suggest you always engage a good CPA.  I learned long ago that when it comes to doing something ordinarily requiring years of study, hire a professional and save headaches and money.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by John</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7172</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7172</guid>
		<description>I am currently looking to either get QuickBooks Pro or Peachtree. I am starting a very small finance company where I plan to buy inheritances at a discount; do factoring (i.e., buying invoices at a discount); and make limited small commercial/consumer loans.

Between QuickBooks and Peachtree, which product would (1) allow me to prepare financial statements and footnote disclosures in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (2) be best suited for my type of business, and (3) allow me to prepare reports that would be accepted by banks and investors for getting financing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently looking to either get QuickBooks Pro or Peachtree. I am starting a very small finance company where I plan to buy inheritances at a discount; do factoring (i.e., buying invoices at a discount); and make limited small commercial/consumer loans.</p>
<p>Between QuickBooks and Peachtree, which product would (1) allow me to prepare financial statements and footnote disclosures in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (2) be best suited for my type of business, and (3) allow me to prepare reports that would be accepted by banks and investors for getting financing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is accounting really boring, or has virtually the entire human race just been getting it all wrong since the beginning of time?! by Is accounting really boring, or has virtually the entire human race just been getting it all wrong since the beginning of time?! &#124; Find the stream &#8212; Vind de stream</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=254&#038;cpage=1#comment-7121</link>
		<dc:creator>Is accounting really boring, or has virtually the entire human race just been getting it all wrong since the beginning of time?! &#124; Find the stream &#8212; Vind de stream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 00:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=254#comment-7121</guid>
		<description>[...] Is accounting really boring, or has virtually the entire human race just been getting it all wrong since the beginning of time?! Is it a libelous fiction promulated by envious marketing individuals because they once flunked intermediate accounting? http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=254 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is accounting really boring, or has virtually the entire human race just been getting it all wrong since the beginning of time?! Is it a libelous fiction promulated by envious marketing individuals because they once flunked intermediate accounting? <a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=254" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=254</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are conservatives this week admitting that the country is fundamentally progressive?  The Mega Power Panel on Cenk Uygur&#8217;s the Young Turks, January 13, 2012, Current TV. Video and transcript. by top rick perry headlines &#124; Chantler 411</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4793&#038;cpage=1#comment-7119</link>
		<dc:creator>top rick perry headlines &#124; Chantler 411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4793#comment-7119</guid>
		<description>[...] Are conservatives this week admitting that the country is &#8230;  My thesis for that is that you have Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, and John Huntsman all talking about breaking up the big banks, Bain Capital, and other terrible things. In fact, other conservatives, like Nikki Haley, are saying, these guys are &#8230; http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/ &#8212; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:25:02 -0800 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are conservatives this week admitting that the country is &#8230;  My thesis for that is that you have Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, and John Huntsman all talking about breaking up the big banks, Bain Capital, and other terrible things. In fact, other conservatives, like Nikki Haley, are saying, these guys are &#8230; <a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/</a> &mdash; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:25:02 -0800 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-7116</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-7116</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing your information about Allstate.  We need to get the word out about how Allstate has its hands in our wallets and pocketbooks.

Liberty Mutual saved me a bundle.  And processed by claim without interrogating me and holding up payment like Allstate did for a mere $125!!!!

I would never trust Allstate again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing your information about Allstate.  We need to get the word out about how Allstate has its hands in our wallets and pocketbooks.</p>
<p>Liberty Mutual saved me a bundle.  And processed by claim without interrogating me and holding up payment like Allstate did for a mere $125!!!!</p>
<p>I would never trust Allstate again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by Nikki Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-7115</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-7115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m currently with Allstate for homeowners and car insurance and was floored when my homeowners insurance went from $500 to $893 a year.  I am currently shopping around for new insurance and will be sure to look into Liberty Mutual as well.  Thanks for the great info and comments/suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently with Allstate for homeowners and car insurance and was floored when my homeowners insurance went from $500 to $893 a year.  I am currently shopping around for new insurance and will be sure to look into Liberty Mutual as well.  Thanks for the great info and comments/suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Melissa Harris-Perry explains why the American economy performs better under Democratic Presidents.  Reverend Al Sharpton&#8217;s Politics Nation, Monday, October 17, 2011, MSNBC TV by Politics kenya</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4251&#038;cpage=1#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics kenya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4251#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>nO matter where  your home is, national politics  almost certainly  plays  part  within your  day to day  living. You will possibly not  right away  cope with  political  problems, but you  know  that will  state policies  performs ...&lt;a href=&quot;http://versicherungsmakler-stuttgart.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;versicherungsmakler stuttgart&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nO matter where  your home is, national politics  almost certainly  plays  part  within your  day to day  living. You will possibly not  right away  cope with  political  problems, but you  know  that will  state policies  performs &#8230;<a href="http://versicherungsmakler-stuttgart.info" rel="nofollow">versicherungsmakler stuttgart</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The conflict between the rich and the poor has become very strong over the past two years. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4758&#038;cpage=1#comment-7111</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4758#comment-7111</guid>
		<description>&lt;object type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; data=&quot;https://clients4.google.com/voice/embed/webCallButton&quot; width=&quot;230&quot; height=&quot;85&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;https://clients4.google.com/voice/embed/webCallButton&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;FlashVars&quot; value=&quot;id=7e35a9054e91371de4fb2ca60d31d4240e0306b6&amp;style=0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="https://clients4.google.com/voice/embed/webCallButton" width="230" height="85"><param name="movie" value="https://clients4.google.com/voice/embed/webCallButton" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="FlashVars" value="id=7e35a9054e91371de4fb2ca60d31d4240e0306b6&#038;style=0" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The conflict between the rich and the poor has become very strong over the past two years. by PEW Research Center study finds growing conflict between rich and poor in the United States &#124; Connecticut Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4758&#038;cpage=1#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator>PEW Research Center study finds growing conflict between rich and poor in the United States &#124; Connecticut Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4758#comment-7110</guid>
		<description>[...] For a detailed discussion of the PEW Research Center study on the growing conflict between the rich and the poor in the United States, please see the article and video, the conflict between the rich and the poor has become very strong over the past two years. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a detailed discussion of the PEW Research Center study on the growing conflict between the rich and the poor in the United States, please see the article and video, the conflict between the rich and the poor has become very strong over the past two years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7099</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7099</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

That&#039;s an interesting question.  Unfortunately, you cannot use Loan Manager in reverse per se since it is designed to process payments to lenders and not to receive payments from borrowers.

I do know, however, a way to use Loan Manager in conjunction with other features in QuickBooks to process receipts from borrowers; however, that is the subject of a future article, which will be published sometime this year.

Stay tuned.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an interesting question.  Unfortunately, you cannot use Loan Manager in reverse per se since it is designed to process payments to lenders and not to receive payments from borrowers.</p>
<p>I do know, however, a way to use Loan Manager in conjunction with other features in QuickBooks to process receipts from borrowers; however, that is the subject of a future article, which will be published sometime this year.</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Alex Smyth</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Smyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-7098</guid>
		<description>Do you know a good way to handle Notes Receivable in Quickbooks (e.g. mortgages)? Can you use Loan Manager ‘in reverse’ ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know a good way to handle Notes Receivable in Quickbooks (e.g. mortgages)? Can you use Loan Manager ‘in reverse’ ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s income tax bill favors the rich. It places Connecticut’s deficit on the backs of the middle class. Is Dannel Malloy positioning himself right of center because of future political aspirations? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906&#038;cpage=1#comment-7081</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906#comment-7081</guid>
		<description>They, the Republican and Democratic politicians, tax us, the middle class, rather than the 1%, that is, the super rich because they get their political contributions from the 1%.  Goldman Sachs was the largest single contributor to President Obama in 2008:  so why would Obama raise taxes on the super rich and the big corporations when he needs those campaign contributions?

Our political system is broken and needs to be replaced.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They, the Republican and Democratic politicians, tax us, the middle class, rather than the 1%, that is, the super rich because they get their political contributions from the 1%.  Goldman Sachs was the largest single contributor to President Obama in 2008:  so why would Obama raise taxes on the super rich and the big corporations when he needs those campaign contributions?</p>
<p>Our political system is broken and needs to be replaced.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s income tax bill favors the rich. It places Connecticut’s deficit on the backs of the middle class. Is Dannel Malloy positioning himself right of center because of future political aspirations? by Alisha Tindal</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906&#038;cpage=1#comment-7080</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha Tindal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906#comment-7080</guid>
		<description>How can they tax us and we are already in a financial struggle yet the rich get it easy. so unfair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can they tax us and we are already in a financial struggle yet the rich get it easy. so unfair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on President Obama&#8217;s Jobs Bill is an Insult to the American Workers and Unemployed by President Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4236&#038;cpage=1#comment-7064</link>
		<dc:creator>President Barack Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4236#comment-7064</guid>
		<description>I promised you &quot;change&quot; and that&#039;s what you are getting: pennies and nickels! I&#039;m saving the big bucks for Government Sachs and other Wall Street contributors to my campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I promised you &#8220;change&#8221; and that&#8217;s what you are getting: pennies and nickels! I&#8217;m saving the big bucks for Government Sachs and other Wall Street contributors to my campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-7030</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-7030</guid>
		<description>I take it that you signed the petition...LOL!

Stealing from the middle class and giving to the rich will perhaps get him in good graces with his Wall Street country club neighbors in Fairfield County.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it that you signed the petition&#8230;LOL!</p>
<p>Stealing from the middle class and giving to the rich will perhaps get him in good graces with his Wall Street country club neighbors in Fairfield County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-7028</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-7028</guid>
		<description>Another 3 years of this bozo unless he gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar and he can be impeached. He is a total embarrassment to Ct!  There is absolutely no reason he should be ridiculing,mocking,demeaning anyone,as he did with Gov Mr Christie,and it makes the rest of us look bad.I think the word here is &quot;jealousy&quot; and Malloy is just a tiny minnow in the politican sea. Gov Mr Christie and Gov Mr Cuomo are respected by both sides of the political spectrum and are doing fantastic jobs for their states,and one man is Rep and the other Dem. And then we have Malloy. People will think that all citizens of Ct are like him and that is totally untrue..This arrogant little man has got to get a grip on himself,his attitude,and his spending.! Our only hope now is that ,hopefully, he will run for senator, lose the election, and be out of politics.FOREVER!  I am planning to get out of this state ASAP!I have been reading the 3 week saga about Malloy which has appeared in the Ct Post and I am just horrified with his  sarcastic remarks,his snickering, his foul language,his  ridiculing of others...................this man is a bully!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another 3 years of this bozo unless he gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar and he can be impeached. He is a total embarrassment to Ct!  There is absolutely no reason he should be ridiculing,mocking,demeaning anyone,as he did with Gov Mr Christie,and it makes the rest of us look bad.I think the word here is &#8220;jealousy&#8221; and Malloy is just a tiny minnow in the politican sea. Gov Mr Christie and Gov Mr Cuomo are respected by both sides of the political spectrum and are doing fantastic jobs for their states,and one man is Rep and the other Dem. And then we have Malloy. People will think that all citizens of Ct are like him and that is totally untrue..This arrogant little man has got to get a grip on himself,his attitude,and his spending.! Our only hope now is that ,hopefully, he will run for senator, lose the election, and be out of politics.FOREVER!  I am planning to get out of this state ASAP!I have been reading the 3 week saga about Malloy which has appeared in the Ct Post and I am just horrified with his  sarcastic remarks,his snickering, his foul language,his  ridiculing of others&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.this man is a bully!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-6994</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-6994</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;President Barack Obama raised $750 million in his Presidential campaign in 2008:  Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street investment firm, was his largest contributor.  Is it any wonder then that President Obama never proposed the re-enactment of the Glass-Steagall Act, requiring the separation of commercial and investment banking, which merger caused not only the Great Depression but the subprime mortgage crisis in 2008?  To get elected and re-elected to office, politicians need to advertise in the media, and that costs big bucks.  And where do the politicians get the big bucks?  From the wealthy 1% and the big corporations, now that Citizens United allows unlimited campaign funds.

Recall that Bill Clinton was worth around $250,000 in 1992.  When Hillary declared her candidacy in 2008, the Clintons were worth $109 million.

Lobbying monies has been characterized by critics as legalized bribery.  How many politicians have advanced legislation not in the interests of the majority of Americans simply for money?  I suspect far too many.  This is the problem of our political system:  our politicians pandering for money.

The Barefoot Accountant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a>President Barack Obama raised $750 million in his Presidential campaign in 2008:  Goldman Sachs, the Wall Street investment firm, was his largest contributor.  Is it any wonder then that President Obama never proposed the re-enactment of the Glass-Steagall Act, requiring the separation of commercial and investment banking, which merger caused not only the Great Depression but the subprime mortgage crisis in 2008?  To get elected and re-elected to office, politicians need to advertise in the media, and that costs big bucks.  And where do the politicians get the big bucks?  From the wealthy 1% and the big corporations, now that Citizens United allows unlimited campaign funds.</p>
<p>Recall that Bill Clinton was worth around $250,000 in 1992.  When Hillary declared her candidacy in 2008, the Clintons were worth $109 million.</p>
<p>Lobbying monies has been characterized by critics as legalized bribery.  How many politicians have advanced legislation not in the interests of the majority of Americans simply for money?  I suspect far too many.  This is the problem of our political system:  our politicians pandering for money.</p>
<p>The Barefoot Accountant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by Guy Doyon</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-6993</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Doyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-6993</guid>
		<description>Whoops...I&#039;m sorry. I don&#039;t have $10,000.00. My local, state and federal governments have it. I &quot;misspoke&quot; about my finances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops&#8230;I&#8217;m sorry. I don&#8217;t have $10,000.00. My local, state and federal governments have it. I &#8220;misspoke&#8221; about my finances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by Guy Doyon</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-6992</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Doyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-6992</guid>
		<description>It is truly sad that all governments, from the local to the federal level,  have gotten out of control. The millions and millions of dollars given to the pockets of politicians is unbelieveable. The special interest groups that our politicians must kiss up to in order to get their funds for elections and re-elections have been a major cause for where we are today. If we could stop the direct contributions to these career politicians then maybe we the people could actually feel some sort of control over our lives instead of the way everyone feels today. But you know what? We keep electing these same people over and over again. What&#039;s up with that????? Sad times, sad days. Another question...How many of our politicians are millionaires?? Multi-Millionaires? I&#039;ll bet you $10,000.00 that most are!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is truly sad that all governments, from the local to the federal level,  have gotten out of control. The millions and millions of dollars given to the pockets of politicians is unbelieveable. The special interest groups that our politicians must kiss up to in order to get their funds for elections and re-elections have been a major cause for where we are today. If we could stop the direct contributions to these career politicians then maybe we the people could actually feel some sort of control over our lives instead of the way everyone feels today. But you know what? We keep electing these same people over and over again. What&#8217;s up with that????? Sad times, sad days. Another question&#8230;How many of our politicians are millionaires?? Multi-Millionaires? I&#8217;ll bet you $10,000.00 that most are!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by Joseph Zanavich IV</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-6982</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Zanavich IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-6982</guid>
		<description>I have lived in CT my entire life, my wife is originally from Massachusets.
If this keeps up I will sell my new house and move to either Mass. or R.I.
This is crazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have lived in CT my entire life, my wife is originally from Massachusets.<br />
If this keeps up I will sell my new house and move to either Mass. or R.I.<br />
This is crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s income tax bill favors the rich. It places Connecticut’s deficit on the backs of the middle class. Is Dannel Malloy positioning himself right of center because of future political aspirations? by Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906&#038;cpage=1#comment-6966</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906#comment-6966</guid>
		<description>where do i sign, is there a link on this website or am i tolate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where do i sign, is there a link on this website or am i tolate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Susan Bysiewicz has published her Accountability Plan for reforming and fixing America&#8217;s economy and government in Washington.  A Review by the Barefoot Accountant. by The Accountability Plan of Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Democratic Primary Candidate for the US Senate &#124; Connecticut Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4654&#038;cpage=1#comment-6965</link>
		<dc:creator>The Accountability Plan of Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Democratic Primary Candidate for the US Senate &#124; Connecticut Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 03:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4654#comment-6965</guid>
		<description>[...] Susan Bysiewicz has published her Accountability Plan for reforming and fixing America’s economy a... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Susan Bysiewicz has published her Accountability Plan for reforming and fixing America’s economy a&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s income tax bill favors the rich. It places Connecticut’s deficit on the backs of the middle class. Is Dannel Malloy positioning himself right of center because of future political aspirations? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906&#038;cpage=1#comment-6962</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906#comment-6962</guid>
		<description>I feel for you, Roger.  And I share your outrage and anger.

Please sign the petition to let Malloy know.  Perhaps it will deter him from further increases in your Connecticut income taxes.

Thank you for you comment.

Kindest regards,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for you, Roger.  And I share your outrage and anger.</p>
<p>Please sign the petition to let Malloy know.  Perhaps it will deter him from further increases in your Connecticut income taxes.</p>
<p>Thank you for you comment.</p>
<p>Kindest regards,<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy’s income tax bill favors the rich. It places Connecticut’s deficit on the backs of the middle class. Is Dannel Malloy positioning himself right of center because of future political aspirations? by Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906&#038;cpage=1#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2906#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>I had been laidoff for 7 months, finaly get a job, well a month after getting a job i got this guys tax taking out of my check, this isn&#039;t just middle class, i been collecting 580 a week for unemployment, i have wife kids, i been broke and living very limited, anyways get a job this november and now december my second check cuz i get paid every 2 weeks was 1504.00, stupid state took 785.00 out of my check, how the heck is this legal, i was better of on unemployment, marry freggen xmas, i cant even get my kids presents this xmas becuz of this guy, malloy i will never vote for you, matter of fact i am done with democrats, i was always democrat untill now, i will never vote for one again, the fed gov would;t even do this, thanks alot malloy for stealing my money that i so despritly needed,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been laidoff for 7 months, finaly get a job, well a month after getting a job i got this guys tax taking out of my check, this isn&#8217;t just middle class, i been collecting 580 a week for unemployment, i have wife kids, i been broke and living very limited, anyways get a job this november and now december my second check cuz i get paid every 2 weeks was 1504.00, stupid state took 785.00 out of my check, how the heck is this legal, i was better of on unemployment, marry freggen xmas, i cant even get my kids presents this xmas becuz of this guy, malloy i will never vote for you, matter of fact i am done with democrats, i was always democrat untill now, i will never vote for one again, the fed gov would;t even do this, thanks alot malloy for stealing my money that i so despritly needed,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ye Gods, another bad experience with Intuit&#8217;s ProSeries tax software! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491&#038;cpage=1#comment-6945</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 06:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491#comment-6945</guid>
		<description>As you must have gathered from my article, I am no big fan of Pro Series.  Lacerte is much more user friendly:  I like its table of contents, making it much easier to find where to enter data.  Also, in my opinion, it is more robust:  for instance, it calculates interest and penalties for periods of time after filing dates if the return is way overdue.  I recall ProSeries did not even provide a field for the entry of penalties/interest beyond the due dates of corporate 1120 returns.

If I were you, I would consider wire tapping her calls and calling a good divorce lawyer...LOL!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you must have gathered from my article, I am no big fan of Pro Series.  Lacerte is much more user friendly:  I like its table of contents, making it much easier to find where to enter data.  Also, in my opinion, it is more robust:  for instance, it calculates interest and penalties for periods of time after filing dates if the return is way overdue.  I recall ProSeries did not even provide a field for the entry of penalties/interest beyond the due dates of corporate 1120 returns.</p>
<p>If I were you, I would consider wire tapping her calls and calling a good divorce lawyer&#8230;LOL!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ye Gods, another bad experience with Intuit&#8217;s ProSeries tax software! by Steve Burmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491&#038;cpage=1#comment-6943</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Burmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491#comment-6943</guid>
		<description>My wife, MBA Finance, is stuck on Pro Series. When I retired three years ago I decided to help her with returns. I took a class at H&amp;R Block, using of course their software. After passing the class I started helping my wife on Pro Series. I have never used such unfriendly software and I came from the manufacturing world of Symix and 3D modeling! What the what!!?? I created my own Excel spreadsheets for Budgets that interacted 10 tabs deep and never had the FEAR of touching a key like am with PS. Do you think she is having an affair with a PS tech-she calls him all the time? Help me pry my loving wife away from this fiendish software. I am not the professional-she is. THEREFORE, AS YOU REQUESTED BILL-WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife, MBA Finance, is stuck on Pro Series. When I retired three years ago I decided to help her with returns. I took a class at H&amp;R Block, using of course their software. After passing the class I started helping my wife on Pro Series. I have never used such unfriendly software and I came from the manufacturing world of Symix and 3D modeling! What the what!!?? I created my own Excel spreadsheets for Budgets that interacted 10 tabs deep and never had the FEAR of touching a key like am with PS. Do you think she is having an affair with a PS tech-she calls him all the time? Help me pry my loving wife away from this fiendish software. I am not the professional-she is. THEREFORE, AS YOU REQUESTED BILL-WHAT IS THE ALTERNATIVE??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Liberal&#8221; is not a dirty word by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-6939</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-6939</guid>
		<description>LOL!  Love it.  Thank you for commenting.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  Love it.  Thank you for commenting.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Liberal&#8221; is not a dirty word by Mason Kuldinow</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1610&#038;cpage=1#comment-6938</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason Kuldinow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1610#comment-6938</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. I thought so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. I thought so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cenk Uygur: President Barack Obama failed the economic recovery with a stimulus package too small by President Obama alibiing the failure of his 2009 economic stimulus package &#124; Connecticut Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4620&#038;cpage=1#comment-6925</link>
		<dc:creator>President Obama alibiing the failure of his 2009 economic stimulus package &#124; Connecticut Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4620#comment-6925</guid>
		<description>[...] of President Obama on his repeated failure to listen to progressives, please see the article, President Barack Obama failed the economic recovery with a stimulus package too small    GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of President Obama on his repeated failure to listen to progressives, please see the article, President Barack Obama failed the economic recovery with a stimulus package too small    GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cenk Uygur: President Barack Obama failed the economic recovery with a stimulus package too small by William Brighenti, CPA, Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4620&#038;cpage=1#comment-6923</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti, CPA, Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4620#comment-6923</guid>
		<description>Lest you forget, President Barack Obama&#039;s biggest campaign contributor in 2008 was Goldman Sachs (better known as, Government Sachs).  So no wonder Obama heeded the counsel of Wall Streeters like Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers instead of economists and progressives and Main Street America, who voted for him in 2008.  He supported and extended the 1% tax cuts instead of focusing on the creation of jobs for the working and middle classes of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lest you forget, President Barack Obama&#8217;s biggest campaign contributor in 2008 was Goldman Sachs (better known as, Government Sachs).  So no wonder Obama heeded the counsel of Wall Streeters like Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers instead of economists and progressives and Main Street America, who voted for him in 2008.  He supported and extended the 1% tax cuts instead of focusing on the creation of jobs for the working and middle classes of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Implement the Percentage-of-Completion Method of Accounting by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=20&#038;cpage=1#comment-6920</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=20#comment-6920</guid>
		<description>There are two kinds of losses on contracts:  an interim loss or an overall loss for the project.

Under the percentage-of-completion method, losses in either case are immediately recognized.
	
However, under the completed contract method, losses are recognized immediately only when overall losses are indicated.

If you are referring to an expected overall loss on the entire contract, under the completed contract method, you would simply book the anticipated loss.  Under the percentage-of-completion, you would not only have to book the total anticipated loss on the contract but also reverse out the gain previously recorded:  that is, the total amount of the journal entry would be the sum of the absolute values of the anticipated loss plus the previously recognized gain.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two kinds of losses on contracts:  an interim loss or an overall loss for the project.</p>
<p>Under the percentage-of-completion method, losses in either case are immediately recognized.</p>
<p>However, under the completed contract method, losses are recognized immediately only when overall losses are indicated.</p>
<p>If you are referring to an expected overall loss on the entire contract, under the completed contract method, you would simply book the anticipated loss.  Under the percentage-of-completion, you would not only have to book the total anticipated loss on the contract but also reverse out the gain previously recorded:  that is, the total amount of the journal entry would be the sum of the absolute values of the anticipated loss plus the previously recognized gain.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Accountants CPA Hartford, Connecticut, LLC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Implement the Percentage-of-Completion Method of Accounting by Caleb</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=20&#038;cpage=1#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=20#comment-6918</guid>
		<description>This is pertaining to the percentage of completion and completed contract method explanation. 

What if in year 2, our estimates of the cost goes up which results in a loss whereas in the first year we have already recognized a gain? How do we journalize those entries in the books under both the percentage of completion method and completed contract method?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pertaining to the percentage of completion and completed contract method explanation. </p>
<p>What if in year 2, our estimates of the cost goes up which results in a loss whereas in the first year we have already recognized a gain? How do we journalize those entries in the books under both the percentage of completion method and completed contract method?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-6898</guid>
		<description>I wrote an article on this hot topic a while back:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://cpa-connecticut.com/goodwill-tax-loss-deduction.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Can You Deduct Worthless Goodwill on Your Tax Return? Internal Revenue Code Section 197 Creating Ill Will&lt;/a&gt; .

Generally you would allocate the remaining basis of the worthless intangible to the other remaining intangibles.  But your client&#039;s situation raises a question.  Did the covenant not to compete have anything to do with the loss of the customer base of your client?  For instance, did the former owner compete and steal those customers from your client?  If not, then the loss of customers may have little to do with that intangible.  It might have been the result of poor management, the state of the economy, or a number of factors. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article on this hot topic a while back:  <a href="http://cpa-connecticut.com/goodwill-tax-loss-deduction.html" rel="nofollow">Can You Deduct Worthless Goodwill on Your Tax Return? Internal Revenue Code Section 197 Creating Ill Will</a> .</p>
<p>Generally you would allocate the remaining basis of the worthless intangible to the other remaining intangibles.  But your client&#8217;s situation raises a question.  Did the covenant not to compete have anything to do with the loss of the customer base of your client?  For instance, did the former owner compete and steal those customers from your client?  If not, then the loss of customers may have little to do with that intangible.  It might have been the result of poor management, the state of the economy, or a number of factors. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by Wayne A. Sparrow, CPA</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-6894</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne A. Sparrow, CPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-6894</guid>
		<description>Writeoff of Sec 197 Intangible Goodwill ( Customer Lists)

My client bought a business about three years ago for $ 1.3M which except for a small amount allocated to equipment and covenant not to compete, has been allocated to goodwill ( customer lists). We have been amortizing the goodwill and covenant not to compete over 15 years.

Now, after a recent review of the customer lists, we have found about 25% of the customers have been loss.

According to the tax code, you have to allocate any decrease in value to another intangible asset. In my case, the unamortized portion of the loss customers equals about $ 240K. The original amount of covenant not to compete was $ 100,000. I think that the amount allocated to covenant not to compete is fixed and cannot be increased.

Therefore, I think my only real choice is to expense the portion allocated to loss customers.

I would appreciate any advise from other tax professionals on my position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writeoff of Sec 197 Intangible Goodwill ( Customer Lists)</p>
<p>My client bought a business about three years ago for $ 1.3M which except for a small amount allocated to equipment and covenant not to compete, has been allocated to goodwill ( customer lists). We have been amortizing the goodwill and covenant not to compete over 15 years.</p>
<p>Now, after a recent review of the customer lists, we have found about 25% of the customers have been loss.</p>
<p>According to the tax code, you have to allocate any decrease in value to another intangible asset. In my case, the unamortized portion of the loss customers equals about $ 240K. The original amount of covenant not to compete was $ 100,000. I think that the amount allocated to covenant not to compete is fixed and cannot be increased.</p>
<p>Therefore, I think my only real choice is to expense the portion allocated to loss customers.</p>
<p>I would appreciate any advise from other tax professionals on my position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cenk Uygur on President Obama&#8217;s born-again Progressivism.  Obama does not walk the talk. by Is President Obama a born-again progressive? &#124; Connecticut Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4550&#038;cpage=1#comment-6888</link>
		<dc:creator>Is President Obama a born-again progressive? &#124; Connecticut Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4550#comment-6888</guid>
		<description>[...] more on Obama&#8217;s born-again progressivism, please see Cenk Uygur on President Obama’s born-again Progressivism. Obama does not walk the talk,  where a video and full transcript of Cenk Uygur&#8217;s interview of Senator Bernie Sanders on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more on Obama&#8217;s born-again progressivism, please see Cenk Uygur on President Obama’s born-again Progressivism. Obama does not walk the talk,  where a video and full transcript of Cenk Uygur&#8217;s interview of Senator Bernie Sanders on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What caused the economic collapse, recession, depression, in 2008? How did Wall Street bring on America&#8217;s economic collapse? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604&#038;cpage=1#comment-6877</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604#comment-6877</guid>
		<description>Yes, very true.  Many of the investment houses and banks overseas invested in these mortgage-backed securities and suffered greatly.  Iceland is a perfect example:  please see the very informative movie about the devastating impact on Iceland&#039;s economy, &quot;Inside Job&quot;.

Thank you for your comment,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, very true.  Many of the investment houses and banks overseas invested in these mortgage-backed securities and suffered greatly.  Iceland is a perfect example:  please see the very informative movie about the devastating impact on Iceland&#8217;s economy, &#8220;Inside Job&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment,<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What caused the economic collapse, recession, depression, in 2008? How did Wall Street bring on America&#8217;s economic collapse? by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604&#038;cpage=1#comment-6876</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604#comment-6876</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  I will.  Please feel free to contribute your thoughts, comments, or articles.  I deeply appreciate your interest and comments.

Thank you, again,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  I will.  Please feel free to contribute your thoughts, comments, or articles.  I deeply appreciate your interest and comments.</p>
<p>Thank you, again,<br />
<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What caused the economic collapse, recession, depression, in 2008? How did Wall Street bring on America&#8217;s economic collapse? by Bookkeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604&#038;cpage=1#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookkeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604#comment-6873</guid>
		<description>I do not know how true is it, but in Russian TV (First Baltic Canal) was information, that crisis in Europe is provoked by USA (sorry:)). To save USD, problems to EUR provoked.
But it is according to Russian TV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know how true is it, but in Russian TV (First Baltic Canal) was information, that crisis in Europe is provoked by USA (sorry:)). To save USD, problems to EUR provoked.<br />
But it is according to Russian TV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What caused the economic collapse, recession, depression, in 2008? How did Wall Street bring on America&#8217;s economic collapse? by mike domingue</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604&#038;cpage=1#comment-6771</link>
		<dc:creator>mike domingue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4604#comment-6771</guid>
		<description>I love your articles...keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your articles&#8230;keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is President Barack Obama a Wall Streeter?  Of Course!!!! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3444&#038;cpage=1#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3444#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>Fantastic article!  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic article!  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is President Barack Obama a Wall Streeter?  Of Course!!!! by More utter bullshit from our elected officials on the confirmation of Richard Cordray &#124; Revolutionary Radar</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3444&#038;cpage=1#comment-6766</link>
		<dc:creator>More utter bullshit from our elected officials on the confirmation of Richard Cordray &#124; Revolutionary Radar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3444#comment-6766</guid>
		<description>[...] deregulation of derivatives. The (dirty) laundry list of thieves in the Obama administration appears in this great article by William Brighenti on The Barefoot Accountant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deregulation of derivatives. The (dirty) laundry list of thieves in the Obama administration appears in this great article by William Brighenti on The Barefoot Accountant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Elect Warren Buffett for President!  He has the guts to raise taxes on the rich! by Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4284&#038;cpage=1#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4284#comment-6760</guid>
		<description>Great idea!

He started it, and he can finish it; besides, he now owns his own propaganda machine in his newspaper, and he can leave his billions in trust to the US Government to fund social security and medicare since he has already disclaimed taxable ownership of his billions. What is the different in leaving funds to the government and land to the government - just a difference in substance that all robber barons of the 1930&#039;s came to appreciate. Isn&#039;t that where the Grand Canyon and most of the public parks came from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea!</p>
<p>He started it, and he can finish it; besides, he now owns his own propaganda machine in his newspaper, and he can leave his billions in trust to the US Government to fund social security and medicare since he has already disclaimed taxable ownership of his billions. What is the different in leaving funds to the government and land to the government &#8211; just a difference in substance that all robber barons of the 1930&#8242;s came to appreciate. Isn&#8217;t that where the Grand Canyon and most of the public parks came from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-6326</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-6326</guid>
		<description>I envy you.  New Hampshire, incidentally, is beautiful, especially near Mount Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I envy you.  New Hampshire, incidentally, is beautiful, especially near Mount Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sign the petition to protest Governor Malloy&#8217;s Connecticut tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, targeting the middle class.  It&#8217;s time to tax the rich, not the middle class! by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915&#038;cpage=1#comment-6324</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3915#comment-6324</guid>
		<description>I am a working in MA and living in Enfield CT.  The minute my lease expires I will relocate to new hampshire or massachusetts.
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a working in MA and living in Enfield CT.  The minute my lease expires I will relocate to new hampshire or massachusetts.<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to fix our American economy and create more jobs?  A 19 point progressive program to stop the hemorrhaging of our country&#8217;s life blood! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607&#038;cpage=1#comment-6323</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607#comment-6323</guid>
		<description>Your comment is very well written.  Thank you for such a detailed, thoughtful, eloquent response to my article.  A+++.

If you ran for political office, I would not only vote for you, but stand alongside in the trenches and fight for those reforms.

Thank you.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment is very well written.  Thank you for such a detailed, thoughtful, eloquent response to my article.  A+++.</p>
<p>If you ran for political office, I would not only vote for you, but stand alongside in the trenches and fight for those reforms.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">The Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to fix our American economy and create more jobs?  A 19 point progressive program to stop the hemorrhaging of our country&#8217;s life blood! by sunwukong</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607&#038;cpage=1#comment-6322</link>
		<dc:creator>sunwukong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=2607#comment-6322</guid>
		<description>Perhaps not well written but some more ideas
*******************
The functions of Government

(It may be that some of these ideas are poorly conceived or could have negative consequences.  The point is not that it is right or wrong, good or bad, the real point is that all of these things need to be discussed and resolved or we are all going to be &quot;S.O.L&quot;).  The idea that we will have another election in 2012 and we will be faced with all this time-worn outdated trivia that seems to attract such a mob of losers and crooks.  We need someone to make hard decisions who can come up with a semi workable solution or should we all just brush up on our Chinese?  

Background: At this juncture it is clear that the problem is not only with the President or with Congress or the Supreme Court.  Each of these three pillars of the so called &quot;checks and balances&quot; government has failed to keep faith with the aspirations and hopes of the people.  There are no checks and balances.  Each of the three are working to support the rich at the expense of the poor. Instead they have become the spokesmen, spies and enforcers for the privileged class.  The privileged class has thru the military industrial complex infiltrated and subverted the national level intelligence and security apparatus and has quietly taken over.  Laws are not passed to ensure the &quot;life, liberty and pursuit of happiness&quot; of the common people, the 99.9%.  Instead the entire government structure acts to protect and enlarge the fortunes of the .1% at the expense of the 99.9%.  It is not a matter of left or right, conservative or liberal, free market or fair market, well to do or poor it is a matter of how we as the 99.9% want to live.  The question has become are the 99.9% going to sit idly by while the .1% make life on this planet a living hell.  So it is not a matter of a fix to the present system that has a proven track record of abject failure running along a right of way (some would say the wrong way) littered with wars of aggression and conquest spreading economic enslavement and divisive waste and pollution, threatening not only human life but life itself.  Why has government become the protector of scam artists and ponzi schemes? Why have our news outlets and intelligence services been transformed into corporate propaganda mills?

Principles:
What should we set out to do?  It is perhaps time to ask &quot;what is the proper function of a Government&quot;?

Protect Citizen Rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. 

Ensure the sustainability of resources, national defense and the commons (air, forests, parks, water, energy).

We don&#039;t need to fix the present system of government.  We need a new system built from the ground up on a sustainable, humane and workable set of values and principles.

No provision is made for the protection of or favoring of any religion or belief system, no tax breaks for religion and no special status for religious law or custom.  Complete separation of religion and government.

No human weather citizen or not should face discrimination because of race, religion, sexual orientation or disability including mental capacity.

Ensure competition and safe delivery of health and human services.  Every human has the same basic human rights.  Low cost quality health care is a fundamental responsibility of society and government. (Why do nations like Taiwan, Japan and South Korea have better health care systems than the US?  Each of these countries had to rebuild itself after the devastation of World War II, yet their system provides more equitable health care than ours.  The governments of each of these countries after WWII were not democratic by any stretch of the imagination.  How did this happen?) 

No patents on living things.  No release of GMO organisms into the wild. Genetic research and development must be done in a controlled environment with adequate safeguards.   No trans-genetic material is safe until proven safe.

Protect and maintain the common elements of society and the environment.  These are the things that belong to all the people of the world.

Roads, schools, parks, communications and information systems, banking, food supply and air and water.

No special categories of humans (&quot;illegal alien&quot;, &quot;Illegal combatant&quot;, &quot;enemy combatant&quot;) may be used to deny a basic human right.  No extra-constitutional or secret renditions, prisons or interrogations.  

All communications infrastructure belongs to the commons.  No corporation or cabal of individuals should have control over the means of communications.  Communications and free speech are essential individual, human rights and must not be owned or dominated by government or private organizations.  The role of media is to inform in a timely manner so that citizens can make informed judgments and cast votes to shape and implement public policy.  The content of all media must be viewed not only on the basis of its intellectual, historical, or entertainment value but must also be evaluated on the basis of its propaganda value.  As someone once said, &quot;propaganda is not everything, but everything is propaganda.&quot;

Government must solicit input from the citizenry not only on who works in government but the very priorities, goals and method of execution of laws.  To do so requires citizen input. Government is a collective cooperative tool formed of the people, by the people and for the people (not just the rich individuals and cooperation&#039;s). 

Encourage a healthy economy by facilitating efficiency and competition thereby ensuring employment, safe working conditions, just wages and freedom of the people from the tyranny of big government and big corporations.  All infrastructure should be the property of the people.  All transmission bandwidth, roads, cable, wireless, water, sewer and waterways, air ports and routes and all other means of information transmission, transportation and regulation thereof become public property to be administered by the people through their vote.  New infrastructure will be developed by the government on a service basis not a profit basis. A modern nation needs information flow to enable an informed electorate to vote for the common good.

The economy must serve the national interests and must be responsible for a clean environment, sustainable future and prosperous and informed citizenry.  The economy is a vital segment of our national strength and steps should be taken to ensure that it is secure and free from manipulation.  (Close down wall street gambling with other peoples money, naked short selling, bear raids, dark pools, credit default swaps, ponzi schemes or any artifice that does not involve a product (physical thing).  A business that needs to borrow money to make a payrole should not exist.

Banks should be community operated cooperatives baised on community values not wall street greed.  All transactions must be traceable and open.

Insurance should be community sponsored and closely monitored by citizen appointed regulators.

Items not suitable for sale in the United States shall not be exported to other countries.  

Function over fashion.  All manufacturers must offer generic products.  (E.G., car maker x can offer fassion car a, b and c, but it must offer a generic no frills car that has standard, tires, headlights, engine, transmission etc. ) Not just medications, cars, televisions, computers, rugs, beds, foods. The role of government is to standardize the essential elements of things used by citizens.  Headlights should all fit all vehicles, etc. Citizen / consumers should have the right to efficient low cost products that meet practical needs.

Education should emphasize creativity and cooperation among citizens.  Public funds, student loans may not be used to prop up diploma mills and create a class of economic slaves.

All product advertisements presented to the public become public property and are to be archived by the FCC.  These ads will be made available online to all citizens, free of charge.  Citizens have a right to know what is in these advertisements and a duty to hold the companies and products accountable for quality, reliability and safety.

Copyrights for music, video, motion pictures, poetry and literature shall be granted for 3 years after which they are public property.  An archive copy of all works will be made publicly available to allow the public free of cost to assess the content for analysis of advertising or propaganda.  No organization or individual may hide behind patent or copyright law to exercise influence over society in general or members or evade responsibility for misrepresentations, or hide psychological coercion of members or society at large. 

Any organization that solicits or collects goods, money or services from its members shall be classed as a business and taxed accordingly.  Tax schedules shall be graduated by a sliding scale based on the perceived public good performed by that business.  Thus a large holding company that contributed no value added to the aggregate of its sub components could be taxed at a proportion inverse to its value to the common good, while a larger corporation that filled a valid social need, the same inverse proportion rate.

All media outlets must provide free time for rebuttal to any advertisement, movie, poem, song or other public display or presentation of any material.  Art is essential to a full life but all art has a component of propaganda that must be examined for its utility to society.

Financial transactions that do not involve the production of goods yet involve risk will be taxed as gambling.  (The intent here is to severely restrict and regulate Wall Street.)  Insurance may be provided for tangible, physical assets but not for intangibles or pure &quot;investment&quot;.  Insurance may not be used to back up gambling.  Insurance can only be issued to someone with ownership of the item being insured and only once.    

Ensure that our laws do not encourage the creation of predatory groups.  Behaviors that encourage only the accumulation of wealth and resources at the expense of others should be officially discouraged. Government should intelligently address victimless crimes and actively monitor and discourage the formation of predatory cabals and corporate entities that work to despoil the environment and enslave the people. Reign in Wall Street.

Legalize Drugs and prostitution.  Prohibition was a smoke screen to create the income tax.  The rich mobilized one segment of the underclass (largely females) and enticed them into believing that prohibition was the &quot;cure&quot; for their plight. At the same time revenues lost on the sale of alcohol necessitated an income tax which was &quot;enacted&quot; without ratification. Additionally prohibition encouraged the creation and proliferation of a criminal industry which in turn subverted our national police and intelligence apparatus.

Re open investigations into JFK assassination, Robert Kennedy Assassination, MLK assassination, 911, Iraq War, and roles of Saudi Arabia, Israeli and Pakistan in 911.  Investigate election tampering by the supreme court. Dig deep and fix the problems discovered.  Completely re work all Intelligence and Security organizations to re-structure, re-direct and re-envigorate them to work against not for the enemies of humanity.

Each and every word, phrase, sentence, paragraph of the constitution and all amendments should be publicly discussed and voted up or down by the population at large.  Moreover the ratification process for all amendments should be examined to determine if amendments were properly ratified if not they are null and void.   (This would put income tax and the Federal Reserve System out of business restoring the governments&#039; role in tax matters and in the management of the creation of money.) If this is too cumbersome a constitutional crisis committee should be formed, vetted and begin the process of developing a new constitution.

Original intent must be spelled out clearly in any new laws enacted, and for each sentence, phrase and paragraph of the existing / new constitution.  Why force the supreme court guess when we can nail it down. Without stating intent we enable greed and corruption.

U.S. Human rights and laws apply to all people, not just US Citizens.  (No torture, no invasions, no &quot;errand boys for the rich&quot;, (remember Smedley Darlington Butler (July 30, 1881 – June 21, 1940).)  

All aspects of the US Government and the functions of media, intelligence, information, military and police must be periodically audited by the people.  No more secret government. All government employees of military, police, executive, legislative judiciary, and intelligence are prohibited from any kind of direct or indirect investment or sharing of any insider information. Transparency in government is necessary if citizens are to make informed decisions.

The functions of government to regulate, inspect, enforce, defend, police and punish may not be contracted out.

The right of the people to bear arms collect facts, and monitor the performance of elected officials and public employees shall not be infringed.  Clarify the language so that this is absolutely clear.  Information, cameras, recordings are also weapons in the hands of an informed citizenry, perhaps more important that weapons of violence as access to information can prevent the abuse that makes violence necessary. (A vigilant, and aggressive news gathering system in which all aspects of governance, commerce, culture and religion are open to public inspection comment and censure is essential to a real value based society.) All aspects of government, police, military, intelligence are open to public review.  Government employees who feel that they are being asked to perform illegal or immoral tasks must report such actions or face criminal penalties commensurate for the damage or costs of those illegal or immoral tasks.  

No infiltration or use of job or religion or voluntary or professional organization may be used as cover for government agencies, private propaganda or intelligence collection.  Explicitly spell out the rights and duties of citizens to monitor, record, film, videotape public officials in the performance of their duties.

All police interrogations of suspects must be video taped and witnessed by independent observers.  Omissions of even the slightest time or questions will invalidate the investigation and perjure the prosecution.  

All investigative files must be made public within 10 days of their creation.  All accusations of improper acts by public officials must be made public within 15 days of their reporting.  Public officials at all levels must report misconduct committed by public officials or face similar charges.  

Whistleblowers must be given protection and must be adequately compensated for their prompt reporting of criminal or foolish activities.  This should extend to lifetime full taxed exempt pay should they find themselves unable to continue working in their established profession.  The pay and benefits they receive should be taken from others in their working environment who did not report but were aware of the reported action.

Wikileaks should be institutionalized and made part of a world body of knowledge about misdeeds of all corporate and government activities that violate basic human rights.

Public employees who misuse their office will be terminated. (not fired, I&#039;m talking capital punishment for taking a bribe over a parking ticket.)  Abuse by police, fire, medical, health and safety, building inspectors or welfare officials will be investigated in public by the public.  Violators will be dealt with without mercy.

The voting system must be fair and accountable.  Each voter in each election must be able to track his or her vote from the time it is cast to the final count.  No voter may be denied the right to vote.  All votes must be published along with their identifying Voter election ID (known only to voters).  No private corporations may count or manage any aspect of the election process.

Legislative, Judicial and Executive Office employees may not vote themselves special privilege, tax cuts or pay raises without ballot approval.

All jurors must be informed of their duty to judge not only the facts of a case but the law and its application.  Once empanelled jurors may recuse the judge if it is agreed that he is biased.  Jurors have the duty to seek clarification of facts and ask questions of witnesses and the accused thru written questions passed to the judge thru the jury foreman.  The Judge must read the questions out loud in court and they become part of the trial record.  Similarly before summation of arguments anyone present may present questions to the by passing them thru the bailiff to the Jury Foreman.  No one is allowed to view the question before the Jury Foreman.  All questions asked must be read aloud and be entered into the trial record by the jury Foreman.

Any comments by a judge prejudicial to the image of the court, its proceedings, the litigants, attorneys warrant the removal and fine of the judge. (Snide comments and personal prejudice of individual judges will not be tolerated.)

Solutions not Personalities:

So our current system of government in which two of the current three pillars of a checks and balances system depend on voting in a personality contest with the executive nominating the &quot;wise men&quot; of the third pillar.  Is this effective does it produce solutions that work?  The votes that are given are weak and often meaningless after the election as the personality contest winners do not honor their campaign pledges.  The elected judges do not stand on any principle except protecting the system that put them in power.

Perhaps the people should vote on the issues and solutions and the personality contest can be a thing of the past.  What if instead of a presidential or legislative election we had an election that decided on the issues that need to be resolved, then another election on how those issues would be fixed and another election to decide if the proposed solution was effective enough to pay the individuals or corporations that carried out the fix.

If instead of a once every four year thing elections were held every four days or every week after stirring debate over which of the issues had to be fixed in what priority and how.

Would such a system focus voter energies on problems that are more important than those generated by the present personality driven contest.  Would the priorities shift and nothing get done?  Would voter apathy kill off any chance for meaningful reform and due diligence over public safety, law and order, sanitation, utilities, hospitals and other public facilities?  Surely there would be a need for an executive branch to ride herd over the execution and completion of the contracts to fix or build what needed to be built.  This would elevate voter participation to a level that would leave little time for football games and Friday nights at the local bowling alley or bar.  Perhaps the average person would just as well leave all this hard work and hard choices to a mob of professional crooks, liars and scumbags.

If this sounds like class warfare then I will not be the one to fire the first shot but I will not sit on the sidelines with my arms folded across my chest.  Its either the soap box, the ballot box or (the sky god forbid) the ammunition box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps not well written but some more ideas<br />
*******************<br />
The functions of Government</p>
<p>(It may be that some of these ideas are poorly conceived or could have negative consequences.  The point is not that it is right or wrong, good or bad, the real point is that all of these things need to be discussed and resolved or we are all going to be &#8220;S.O.L&#8221;).  The idea that we will have another election in 2012 and we will be faced with all this time-worn outdated trivia that seems to attract such a mob of losers and crooks.  We need someone to make hard decisions who can come up with a semi workable solution or should we all just brush up on our Chinese?  </p>
<p>Background: At this juncture it is clear that the problem is not only with the President or with Congress or the Supreme Court.  Each of these three pillars of the so called &#8220;checks and balances&#8221; government has failed to keep faith with the aspirations and hopes of the people.  There are no checks and balances.  Each of the three are working to support the rich at the expense of the poor. Instead they have become the spokesmen, spies and enforcers for the privileged class.  The privileged class has thru the military industrial complex infiltrated and subverted the national level intelligence and security apparatus and has quietly taken over.  Laws are not passed to ensure the &#8220;life, liberty and pursuit of happiness&#8221; of the common people, the 99.9%.  Instead the entire government structure acts to protect and enlarge the fortunes of the .1% at the expense of the 99.9%.  It is not a matter of left or right, conservative or liberal, free market or fair market, well to do or poor it is a matter of how we as the 99.9% want to live.  The question has become are the 99.9% going to sit idly by while the .1% make life on this planet a living hell.  So it is not a matter of a fix to the present system that has a proven track record of abject failure running along a right of way (some would say the wrong way) littered with wars of aggression and conquest spreading economic enslavement and divisive waste and pollution, threatening not only human life but life itself.  Why has government become the protector of scam artists and ponzi schemes? Why have our news outlets and intelligence services been transformed into corporate propaganda mills?</p>
<p>Principles:<br />
What should we set out to do?  It is perhaps time to ask &#8220;what is the proper function of a Government&#8221;?</p>
<p>Protect Citizen Rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. </p>
<p>Ensure the sustainability of resources, national defense and the commons (air, forests, parks, water, energy).</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need to fix the present system of government.  We need a new system built from the ground up on a sustainable, humane and workable set of values and principles.</p>
<p>No provision is made for the protection of or favoring of any religion or belief system, no tax breaks for religion and no special status for religious law or custom.  Complete separation of religion and government.</p>
<p>No human weather citizen or not should face discrimination because of race, religion, sexual orientation or disability including mental capacity.</p>
<p>Ensure competition and safe delivery of health and human services.  Every human has the same basic human rights.  Low cost quality health care is a fundamental responsibility of society and government. (Why do nations like Taiwan, Japan and South Korea have better health care systems than the US?  Each of these countries had to rebuild itself after the devastation of World War II, yet their system provides more equitable health care than ours.  The governments of each of these countries after WWII were not democratic by any stretch of the imagination.  How did this happen?) </p>
<p>No patents on living things.  No release of GMO organisms into the wild. Genetic research and development must be done in a controlled environment with adequate safeguards.   No trans-genetic material is safe until proven safe.</p>
<p>Protect and maintain the common elements of society and the environment.  These are the things that belong to all the people of the world.</p>
<p>Roads, schools, parks, communications and information systems, banking, food supply and air and water.</p>
<p>No special categories of humans (&#8220;illegal alien&#8221;, &#8220;Illegal combatant&#8221;, &#8220;enemy combatant&#8221;) may be used to deny a basic human right.  No extra-constitutional or secret renditions, prisons or interrogations.  </p>
<p>All communications infrastructure belongs to the commons.  No corporation or cabal of individuals should have control over the means of communications.  Communications and free speech are essential individual, human rights and must not be owned or dominated by government or private organizations.  The role of media is to inform in a timely manner so that citizens can make informed judgments and cast votes to shape and implement public policy.  The content of all media must be viewed not only on the basis of its intellectual, historical, or entertainment value but must also be evaluated on the basis of its propaganda value.  As someone once said, &#8220;propaganda is not everything, but everything is propaganda.&#8221;</p>
<p>Government must solicit input from the citizenry not only on who works in government but the very priorities, goals and method of execution of laws.  To do so requires citizen input. Government is a collective cooperative tool formed of the people, by the people and for the people (not just the rich individuals and cooperation&#8217;s). </p>
<p>Encourage a healthy economy by facilitating efficiency and competition thereby ensuring employment, safe working conditions, just wages and freedom of the people from the tyranny of big government and big corporations.  All infrastructure should be the property of the people.  All transmission bandwidth, roads, cable, wireless, water, sewer and waterways, air ports and routes and all other means of information transmission, transportation and regulation thereof become public property to be administered by the people through their vote.  New infrastructure will be developed by the government on a service basis not a profit basis. A modern nation needs information flow to enable an informed electorate to vote for the common good.</p>
<p>The economy must serve the national interests and must be responsible for a clean environment, sustainable future and prosperous and informed citizenry.  The economy is a vital segment of our national strength and steps should be taken to ensure that it is secure and free from manipulation.  (Close down wall street gambling with other peoples money, naked short selling, bear raids, dark pools, credit default swaps, ponzi schemes or any artifice that does not involve a product (physical thing).  A business that needs to borrow money to make a payrole should not exist.</p>
<p>Banks should be community operated cooperatives baised on community values not wall street greed.  All transactions must be traceable and open.</p>
<p>Insurance should be community sponsored and closely monitored by citizen appointed regulators.</p>
<p>Items not suitable for sale in the United States shall not be exported to other countries.  </p>
<p>Function over fashion.  All manufacturers must offer generic products.  (E.G., car maker x can offer fassion car a, b and c, but it must offer a generic no frills car that has standard, tires, headlights, engine, transmission etc. ) Not just medications, cars, televisions, computers, rugs, beds, foods. The role of government is to standardize the essential elements of things used by citizens.  Headlights should all fit all vehicles, etc. Citizen / consumers should have the right to efficient low cost products that meet practical needs.</p>
<p>Education should emphasize creativity and cooperation among citizens.  Public funds, student loans may not be used to prop up diploma mills and create a class of economic slaves.</p>
<p>All product advertisements presented to the public become public property and are to be archived by the FCC.  These ads will be made available online to all citizens, free of charge.  Citizens have a right to know what is in these advertisements and a duty to hold the companies and products accountable for quality, reliability and safety.</p>
<p>Copyrights for music, video, motion pictures, poetry and literature shall be granted for 3 years after which they are public property.  An archive copy of all works will be made publicly available to allow the public free of cost to assess the content for analysis of advertising or propaganda.  No organization or individual may hide behind patent or copyright law to exercise influence over society in general or members or evade responsibility for misrepresentations, or hide psychological coercion of members or society at large. </p>
<p>Any organization that solicits or collects goods, money or services from its members shall be classed as a business and taxed accordingly.  Tax schedules shall be graduated by a sliding scale based on the perceived public good performed by that business.  Thus a large holding company that contributed no value added to the aggregate of its sub components could be taxed at a proportion inverse to its value to the common good, while a larger corporation that filled a valid social need, the same inverse proportion rate.</p>
<p>All media outlets must provide free time for rebuttal to any advertisement, movie, poem, song or other public display or presentation of any material.  Art is essential to a full life but all art has a component of propaganda that must be examined for its utility to society.</p>
<p>Financial transactions that do not involve the production of goods yet involve risk will be taxed as gambling.  (The intent here is to severely restrict and regulate Wall Street.)  Insurance may be provided for tangible, physical assets but not for intangibles or pure &#8220;investment&#8221;.  Insurance may not be used to back up gambling.  Insurance can only be issued to someone with ownership of the item being insured and only once.    </p>
<p>Ensure that our laws do not encourage the creation of predatory groups.  Behaviors that encourage only the accumulation of wealth and resources at the expense of others should be officially discouraged. Government should intelligently address victimless crimes and actively monitor and discourage the formation of predatory cabals and corporate entities that work to despoil the environment and enslave the people. Reign in Wall Street.</p>
<p>Legalize Drugs and prostitution.  Prohibition was a smoke screen to create the income tax.  The rich mobilized one segment of the underclass (largely females) and enticed them into believing that prohibition was the &#8220;cure&#8221; for their plight. At the same time revenues lost on the sale of alcohol necessitated an income tax which was &#8220;enacted&#8221; without ratification. Additionally prohibition encouraged the creation and proliferation of a criminal industry which in turn subverted our national police and intelligence apparatus.</p>
<p>Re open investigations into JFK assassination, Robert Kennedy Assassination, MLK assassination, 911, Iraq War, and roles of Saudi Arabia, Israeli and Pakistan in 911.  Investigate election tampering by the supreme court. Dig deep and fix the problems discovered.  Completely re work all Intelligence and Security organizations to re-structure, re-direct and re-envigorate them to work against not for the enemies of humanity.</p>
<p>Each and every word, phrase, sentence, paragraph of the constitution and all amendments should be publicly discussed and voted up or down by the population at large.  Moreover the ratification process for all amendments should be examined to determine if amendments were properly ratified if not they are null and void.   (This would put income tax and the Federal Reserve System out of business restoring the governments&#8217; role in tax matters and in the management of the creation of money.) If this is too cumbersome a constitutional crisis committee should be formed, vetted and begin the process of developing a new constitution.</p>
<p>Original intent must be spelled out clearly in any new laws enacted, and for each sentence, phrase and paragraph of the existing / new constitution.  Why force the supreme court guess when we can nail it down. Without stating intent we enable greed and corruption.</p>
<p>U.S. Human rights and laws apply to all people, not just US Citizens.  (No torture, no invasions, no &#8220;errand boys for the rich&#8221;, (remember Smedley Darlington Butler (July 30, 1881 – June 21, 1940).)  </p>
<p>All aspects of the US Government and the functions of media, intelligence, information, military and police must be periodically audited by the people.  No more secret government. All government employees of military, police, executive, legislative judiciary, and intelligence are prohibited from any kind of direct or indirect investment or sharing of any insider information. Transparency in government is necessary if citizens are to make informed decisions.</p>
<p>The functions of government to regulate, inspect, enforce, defend, police and punish may not be contracted out.</p>
<p>The right of the people to bear arms collect facts, and monitor the performance of elected officials and public employees shall not be infringed.  Clarify the language so that this is absolutely clear.  Information, cameras, recordings are also weapons in the hands of an informed citizenry, perhaps more important that weapons of violence as access to information can prevent the abuse that makes violence necessary. (A vigilant, and aggressive news gathering system in which all aspects of governance, commerce, culture and religion are open to public inspection comment and censure is essential to a real value based society.) All aspects of government, police, military, intelligence are open to public review.  Government employees who feel that they are being asked to perform illegal or immoral tasks must report such actions or face criminal penalties commensurate for the damage or costs of those illegal or immoral tasks.  </p>
<p>No infiltration or use of job or religion or voluntary or professional organization may be used as cover for government agencies, private propaganda or intelligence collection.  Explicitly spell out the rights and duties of citizens to monitor, record, film, videotape public officials in the performance of their duties.</p>
<p>All police interrogations of suspects must be video taped and witnessed by independent observers.  Omissions of even the slightest time or questions will invalidate the investigation and perjure the prosecution.  </p>
<p>All investigative files must be made public within 10 days of their creation.  All accusations of improper acts by public officials must be made public within 15 days of their reporting.  Public officials at all levels must report misconduct committed by public officials or face similar charges.  </p>
<p>Whistleblowers must be given protection and must be adequately compensated for their prompt reporting of criminal or foolish activities.  This should extend to lifetime full taxed exempt pay should they find themselves unable to continue working in their established profession.  The pay and benefits they receive should be taken from others in their working environment who did not report but were aware of the reported action.</p>
<p>Wikileaks should be institutionalized and made part of a world body of knowledge about misdeeds of all corporate and government activities that violate basic human rights.</p>
<p>Public employees who misuse their office will be terminated. (not fired, I&#8217;m talking capital punishment for taking a bribe over a parking ticket.)  Abuse by police, fire, medical, health and safety, building inspectors or welfare officials will be investigated in public by the public.  Violators will be dealt with without mercy.</p>
<p>The voting system must be fair and accountable.  Each voter in each election must be able to track his or her vote from the time it is cast to the final count.  No voter may be denied the right to vote.  All votes must be published along with their identifying Voter election ID (known only to voters).  No private corporations may count or manage any aspect of the election process.</p>
<p>Legislative, Judicial and Executive Office employees may not vote themselves special privilege, tax cuts or pay raises without ballot approval.</p>
<p>All jurors must be informed of their duty to judge not only the facts of a case but the law and its application.  Once empanelled jurors may recuse the judge if it is agreed that he is biased.  Jurors have the duty to seek clarification of facts and ask questions of witnesses and the accused thru written questions passed to the judge thru the jury foreman.  The Judge must read the questions out loud in court and they become part of the trial record.  Similarly before summation of arguments anyone present may present questions to the by passing them thru the bailiff to the Jury Foreman.  No one is allowed to view the question before the Jury Foreman.  All questions asked must be read aloud and be entered into the trial record by the jury Foreman.</p>
<p>Any comments by a judge prejudicial to the image of the court, its proceedings, the litigants, attorneys warrant the removal and fine of the judge. (Snide comments and personal prejudice of individual judges will not be tolerated.)</p>
<p>Solutions not Personalities:</p>
<p>So our current system of government in which two of the current three pillars of a checks and balances system depend on voting in a personality contest with the executive nominating the &#8220;wise men&#8221; of the third pillar.  Is this effective does it produce solutions that work?  The votes that are given are weak and often meaningless after the election as the personality contest winners do not honor their campaign pledges.  The elected judges do not stand on any principle except protecting the system that put them in power.</p>
<p>Perhaps the people should vote on the issues and solutions and the personality contest can be a thing of the past.  What if instead of a presidential or legislative election we had an election that decided on the issues that need to be resolved, then another election on how those issues would be fixed and another election to decide if the proposed solution was effective enough to pay the individuals or corporations that carried out the fix.</p>
<p>If instead of a once every four year thing elections were held every four days or every week after stirring debate over which of the issues had to be fixed in what priority and how.</p>
<p>Would such a system focus voter energies on problems that are more important than those generated by the present personality driven contest.  Would the priorities shift and nothing get done?  Would voter apathy kill off any chance for meaningful reform and due diligence over public safety, law and order, sanitation, utilities, hospitals and other public facilities?  Surely there would be a need for an executive branch to ride herd over the execution and completion of the contracts to fix or build what needed to be built.  This would elevate voter participation to a level that would leave little time for football games and Friday nights at the local bowling alley or bar.  Perhaps the average person would just as well leave all this hard work and hard choices to a mob of professional crooks, liars and scumbags.</p>
<p>If this sounds like class warfare then I will not be the one to fire the first shot but I will not sit on the sidelines with my arms folded across my chest.  Its either the soap box, the ballot box or (the sky god forbid) the ammunition box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social distortion. Does the GOP suffer from social insecurity? Cenk Uygur June 22 2011 video transcript by Bobby Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3850&#038;cpage=1#comment-6281</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 01:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3850#comment-6281</guid>
		<description>How much have the Koch brothers donated to the Cain campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much have the Koch brothers donated to the Cain campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Allstate increase your homeowners insurance premium significantly this year? by bob frazier</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960&#038;cpage=1#comment-6039</link>
		<dc:creator>bob frazier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=1960#comment-6039</guid>
		<description>My Allstate policy, which is the same coverage as last year, is going up from $960 a year to $2,496 dollars. I live a mile outside of a college town in NE Oklahoma, Tahlequah, and am 2 miles from the Tahlequah fire department, a dependable department. But Allstate has changed my coverage department to the Welling fire department, a rural volunteer department located 8.5 miles from my home. I was told that the &#039;rating&#039; for my home, on a scale from 1-9, 1 being the best, my rating went from 4 with Tahlequah to 9 now with Welling. This is a true story, I have been a customer with Allstate for 23 years, paid on time, never late.   Thanks, Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Allstate policy, which is the same coverage as last year, is going up from $960 a year to $2,496 dollars. I live a mile outside of a college town in NE Oklahoma, Tahlequah, and am 2 miles from the Tahlequah fire department, a dependable department. But Allstate has changed my coverage department to the Welling fire department, a rural volunteer department located 8.5 miles from my home. I was told that the &#8216;rating&#8217; for my home, on a scale from 1-9, 1 being the best, my rating went from 4 with Tahlequah to 9 now with Welling. This is a true story, I have been a customer with Allstate for 23 years, paid on time, never late.   Thanks, Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointed in the CL&amp;P&#8217;s power restoration efforts to storms Irene and Alfred?  Then sign the petition below! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4497&#038;cpage=1#comment-6002</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 19:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4497#comment-6002</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey Butler as COO of CL&amp;P, Northeast Utilities, is apparently more concerned with Connecticut Light &amp; Power&#039;s profitability, which is now 16%; normally, utilities are only allowed 10% profitability.  This increase in profitability has been the result of downsizing, laying off 10% of its labor force, closing down substations in New Britain, Bristol, and other areas where crews would have been immediately available for restoration of power, instead of waiting days for crews to arrive from Texas and other remote areas of the country.

Utilities are not supposed to be more interested in profitability than in serving the residents of Connecticut.  There is no free market in utilities, allowing consumers to obtain their electricity elsewhere.

If Governor Dannel Malloy were a true representative of the people, he would propose legislation leving steep penalties on utilities for failing to meet prescribed standards in their restoration of services efforts.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey Butler as COO of CL&amp;P, Northeast Utilities, is apparently more concerned with Connecticut Light &amp; Power&#8217;s profitability, which is now 16%; normally, utilities are only allowed 10% profitability.  This increase in profitability has been the result of downsizing, laying off 10% of its labor force, closing down substations in New Britain, Bristol, and other areas where crews would have been immediately available for restoration of power, instead of waiting days for crews to arrive from Texas and other remote areas of the country.</p>
<p>Utilities are not supposed to be more interested in profitability than in serving the residents of Connecticut.  There is no free market in utilities, allowing consumers to obtain their electricity elsewhere.</p>
<p>If Governor Dannel Malloy were a true representative of the people, he would propose legislation leving steep penalties on utilities for failing to meet prescribed standards in their restoration of services efforts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointed in the CL&amp;P&#8217;s power restoration efforts to storms Irene and Alfred?  Then sign the petition below! by Chris Tangorra</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4497&#038;cpage=1#comment-6001</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tangorra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4497#comment-6001</guid>
		<description>I have my power back finally, but I am going to continue to voice my concern about CL&amp;P&#039;s gross negligence to our elected officials.  If we stop pursuing this issue, we will be in the same horrible position the next time we have a storm.  More people will lose thier lives while CL&amp;P&#039;s profits continue to rise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my power back finally, but I am going to continue to voice my concern about CL&amp;P&#8217;s gross negligence to our elected officials.  If we stop pursuing this issue, we will be in the same horrible position the next time we have a storm.  More people will lose thier lives while CL&amp;P&#8217;s profits continue to rise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disappointed in the CL&amp;P&#8217;s power restoration efforts to storms Irene and Alfred?  Then sign the petition below! by James Ahern</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4497&#038;cpage=1#comment-5990</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ahern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4497#comment-5990</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why cl&amp;p would not pay its contractors from the hurricane. If we don&#039;t pay out bills, we get cut off. They are a.company with millions and millions of dollars. And they can&#039;t pay their bills???? How many people, FAMILIES!!!! were punished because of their neglect. Their is something seriously wrong with this. It has to change. We&#039;re not just customers. We are just a number. We can&#039;t let them raise their rates again either. The heads of the company won&#039;t be able to get a fat bonus. We somehow need to come up with something where we don&#039;t need to depend of corporations. They just want money. They don&#039;t care about us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why cl&amp;p would not pay its contractors from the hurricane. If we don&#8217;t pay out bills, we get cut off. They are a.company with millions and millions of dollars. And they can&#8217;t pay their bills???? How many people, FAMILIES!!!! were punished because of their neglect. Their is something seriously wrong with this. It has to change. We&#8217;re not just customers. We are just a number. We can&#8217;t let them raise their rates again either. The heads of the company won&#8217;t be able to get a fat bonus. We somehow need to come up with something where we don&#8217;t need to depend of corporations. They just want money. They don&#8217;t care about us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ye Gods, another bad experience with Intuit&#8217;s ProSeries tax software! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491&#038;cpage=1#comment-5955</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491#comment-5955</guid>
		<description>Are you, too, disappointed with Intuit ProSeries as a tax software program?  Please post your review and comments for the benefit of others.  Unless you make known your grievances, Intuit will continue to increase the cost of ProSeries without improving the software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you, too, disappointed with Intuit ProSeries as a tax software program?  Please post your review and comments for the benefit of others.  Unless you make known your grievances, Intuit will continue to increase the cost of ProSeries without improving the software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Herman Cain&#8217;s economic plan:  let them eat pizza.  The pizza guy delivers lots of anchovies with his nein-nein-nein tax proposal. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4306&#038;cpage=1#comment-5863</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4306#comment-5863</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your intelligent, well thought-out and articulated comment.  Although I do disagree with some of your points, I highly respect your opinion.

I truly believe that the cause of our economic problems stem from several causes:

1.  Jobs have been going overseas because there is no level playing field.  Require an international minimum wage if trade is to be internationalized.  You can&#039;t have an average wage of 90 cents per hour in China and expect manufacturing jobs to exist here in the United States as well as to have an American manufacturing base, which I believe is vital to our economy and national security.  It&#039;s why we won World War II.

2.  The average CEO earned $9 million per year in 2009.  Why is our GDP suffering?  The lower income people who would not horde their earnings or invest it overseas are getting a smaller piece of the pie from our national economy.  We need to spread the wealth, which would not only benefit those who are not CEOs but also the top 1%, because our gross domestic product would increase from the greater consumer demand.  Also small businesses would be relieved from regressive property taxes since the funding of education and other social programs has been pushed down to the local governments, burdening the small guys and benefitting the multinational corporations, who have been taking their record profits and paying out bigger CEO salaries, dividends to the elite 1%, and investing overseas. 

Thanks for your great comment.

Th&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;e Barefoot Accountant&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your intelligent, well thought-out and articulated comment.  Although I do disagree with some of your points, I highly respect your opinion.</p>
<p>I truly believe that the cause of our economic problems stem from several causes:</p>
<p>1.  Jobs have been going overseas because there is no level playing field.  Require an international minimum wage if trade is to be internationalized.  You can&#8217;t have an average wage of 90 cents per hour in China and expect manufacturing jobs to exist here in the United States as well as to have an American manufacturing base, which I believe is vital to our economy and national security.  It&#8217;s why we won World War II.</p>
<p>2.  The average CEO earned $9 million per year in 2009.  Why is our GDP suffering?  The lower income people who would not horde their earnings or invest it overseas are getting a smaller piece of the pie from our national economy.  We need to spread the wealth, which would not only benefit those who are not CEOs but also the top 1%, because our gross domestic product would increase from the greater consumer demand.  Also small businesses would be relieved from regressive property taxes since the funding of education and other social programs has been pushed down to the local governments, burdening the small guys and benefitting the multinational corporations, who have been taking their record profits and paying out bigger CEO salaries, dividends to the elite 1%, and investing overseas. </p>
<p>Thanks for your great comment.</p>
<p>Th<a href="http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">e Barefoot Accountant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Herman Cain&#8217;s economic plan:  let them eat pizza.  The pizza guy delivers lots of anchovies with his nein-nein-nein tax proposal. by JoeyG</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4306&#038;cpage=1#comment-5862</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4306#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>Like you I am not a fan of Cain&#039;s plan.  I do think the tax code needs to be simplified and tax loopholes which benefit some groups over others should be eliminated.  While a case can be made that the rich do not pay enough, it is a very small part of the problem.  No matter how you restructure how much the government takes from the people (they call it government revenue) the recession will not be solved until the massively bloated federal budget is addressed.  Old Keynsian policies which have been not only been proven ineffective, but have been disastrous has not worked and will never worked until people have confidence in the economy.  There is way too much costly and ineffective regulation, uncertainty, and an exploding deficit that scares people.  The people that might actually have disposable income do not spend it, like they have in the past, because they see 1.3 trillion dollar deficits,which is ignored by the White House and Congress and they know that it eventually has to be paid for, and they will be paying more eventually.

As far as a national sales tax, that is one of the worst ideas ever.  9 percent is a draconian sales tax on top of the already high state sales taxes.  So you are supposedly a conservative who wants less taxes, but you propose a third tax!!  And they are naive to think that it will never be raised.  Only a neocon does that.  Essentially a VAT!  Yes lets model ourselves after Europe, the only people that are in a bigger financial mess then we are, because of their policies.  The easiest way to expand the size of government is with a VAT or national sales tax. Once in place IT WILL NEVER GO AWAY.  Neocons (not traditional conservatives) love it because it funds the military industrial complex at the expense of the middle class and poor.

I do like Cain&#039;s idea of lowering personal income taxes and more importantly lowering corporate tax rates.  The big boys don&#039;t pay the taxes anyways, because they make most of their profits overseas and they don&#039;t pay tax currently on those earnings, thus Tony&#039;s hardware pays more corporate income tax then GE!  The solution is to lower the corporate tax rate to make it more attractive to keep operations in the US.  Then tax corporations like people are taxed in the US.  I mean if Corporations are supposedly people with first amendment rights like the US supreme court thinks, then they should be treated the same as individuals for purposes of taxing their worldwide income.  That is they report their worldwide income and pay taxes on that and not just the US net income.   They can take a deduction for the foreign income taxes they pay.  Lowering the rate to 15% seems to be the popular consensus.  Then lower the individual rates and eliminate all the tax favored deductions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you I am not a fan of Cain&#8217;s plan.  I do think the tax code needs to be simplified and tax loopholes which benefit some groups over others should be eliminated.  While a case can be made that the rich do not pay enough, it is a very small part of the problem.  No matter how you restructure how much the government takes from the people (they call it government revenue) the recession will not be solved until the massively bloated federal budget is addressed.  Old Keynsian policies which have been not only been proven ineffective, but have been disastrous has not worked and will never worked until people have confidence in the economy.  There is way too much costly and ineffective regulation, uncertainty, and an exploding deficit that scares people.  The people that might actually have disposable income do not spend it, like they have in the past, because they see 1.3 trillion dollar deficits,which is ignored by the White House and Congress and they know that it eventually has to be paid for, and they will be paying more eventually.</p>
<p>As far as a national sales tax, that is one of the worst ideas ever.  9 percent is a draconian sales tax on top of the already high state sales taxes.  So you are supposedly a conservative who wants less taxes, but you propose a third tax!!  And they are naive to think that it will never be raised.  Only a neocon does that.  Essentially a VAT!  Yes lets model ourselves after Europe, the only people that are in a bigger financial mess then we are, because of their policies.  The easiest way to expand the size of government is with a VAT or national sales tax. Once in place IT WILL NEVER GO AWAY.  Neocons (not traditional conservatives) love it because it funds the military industrial complex at the expense of the middle class and poor.</p>
<p>I do like Cain&#8217;s idea of lowering personal income taxes and more importantly lowering corporate tax rates.  The big boys don&#8217;t pay the taxes anyways, because they make most of their profits overseas and they don&#8217;t pay tax currently on those earnings, thus Tony&#8217;s hardware pays more corporate income tax then GE!  The solution is to lower the corporate tax rate to make it more attractive to keep operations in the US.  Then tax corporations like people are taxed in the US.  I mean if Corporations are supposedly people with first amendment rights like the US supreme court thinks, then they should be treated the same as individuals for purposes of taxing their worldwide income.  That is they report their worldwide income and pay taxes on that and not just the US net income.   They can take a deduction for the foreign income taxes they pay.  Lowering the rate to 15% seems to be the popular consensus.  Then lower the individual rates and eliminate all the tax favored deductions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ye Gods, another bad experience with Intuit&#8217;s ProSeries tax software! by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491&#038;cpage=1#comment-5783</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491#comment-5783</guid>
		<description>What a great, thorough review of ProSeries.  Thank you so very much for providing this important information for others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great, thorough review of ProSeries.  Thank you so very much for providing this important information for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ye Gods, another bad experience with Intuit&#8217;s ProSeries tax software! by Mc</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491&#038;cpage=1#comment-5751</link>
		<dc:creator>Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=3491#comment-5751</guid>
		<description>My experience with Proseries with mentions of  certain features that Proseries do NOT offer which many customers and former customers have been asking the company to include:

PROS:
1. User friendly interface
2. Relatively easy to use (DON&#039;T use the Interview sheets; use the Return feature to enter the information!)
3. Decent tech support

CONS:
1. Price for software is Increasing esp. the Prof. edition where it includes everything!
- Sad part is that NOT many forms are included which makes the price unreasonable!

2. The company REFUSES to add in the Foreign reporting forms such as Forms 5471, 5472, 8868 and 926.

3. It also REFUSES to correct Form 990 with the &quot;linking&quot; of accounts from external sources into the program. Ctrl + L &quot;links&quot; items to some accounting software or spreadsheets. It NO LONGER links the expenses into Form 990 as of the 2009 + 2010 Form 990 which makes entering the information time consuming and frustrating! Even the linkage to the Revenue side has problems as some revenue items are shown as &quot;Negative&quot; (this is obvious as Revenue items in accounting software are coded as &quot;credits&quot;). It worked well up to the 2008 return but then it all changed in 2009!

4. It does NOT support Consolidated returns nor does it support Form 1040NR entry for &quot;Estate/Trust&quot; option/calculations. Ok... the latter is probably rare (but does happen like it did for me!) but why does Proseries NOT support CONSOLIDATED RETURNS?!
- Some small companies DO file consolidated returns!!

5. It does Not offer the ability to truncate client&#039;s personal information when printing a return by paper/pdf copy.

6. Print to pdf feature is nearly useless. No features included to encrypt the return or to truncate certain information like the taxpayer&#039;s SS#. Can&#039;t even link it to an email program to include as an attachment!

-----------------------------------------------

If I had relatively &quot;simple&quot; returns, I would consider buying Proseries again but NOT if I have to prepare:
1) Consolidated corp. returns
2) Non-profit returns
3) clients with foreign accounts due to the foreign reporting forms requirements.
- The IRS has started to go after and/or audit taxpayers for the FBAR/foreign reporting form requirements!!
- It would be nice to have those forms available in the 1040 or 1120/S or 1065 sections.

ProSeries is meant for the &quot;smaller&quot;, if not &quot;simpler&quot;, tax practitioners who has &quot;simple&quot; clients as it can&#039;t handle the complex clients! ProSeries KILLED itself by NOT including a more comprehensive library of tax forms as the tax world is getting more and more complex every year due to the ever changing tax laws. The company will find itself catering to the &quot;simpleton&quot; tax practitioners and will be left behind as their competitors&#039; tax software can handle those complex issues that ProSeries can not!

Take a look at the ProSeries Tech Support Forum and you&#039;ll discover a lot of issues that people have with ProSeries :(

It&#039;s too bad because the software WAS pretty good but my clientele got complicated and I needed tax software that&#039;s able to deal with the more complex tax filing requirements which ProSeries can NOT handle!

The company REFUSED to listen for MANY years in adding those forms. It sold itself on its &quot;user friendly interface&quot; and &quot;simple to use&quot; features. Too bad the company does NOT listen to its customers (read their tech forum!) and grow it&#039;s software library and features!

It was time to say &quot;Good Bye!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with Proseries with mentions of  certain features that Proseries do NOT offer which many customers and former customers have been asking the company to include:</p>
<p>PROS:<br />
1. User friendly interface<br />
2. Relatively easy to use (DON&#8217;T use the Interview sheets; use the Return feature to enter the information!)<br />
3. Decent tech support</p>
<p>CONS:<br />
1. Price for software is Increasing esp. the Prof. edition where it includes everything!<br />
- Sad part is that NOT many forms are included which makes the price unreasonable!</p>
<p>2. The company REFUSES to add in the Foreign reporting forms such as Forms 5471, 5472, 8868 and 926.</p>
<p>3. It also REFUSES to correct Form 990 with the &#8220;linking&#8221; of accounts from external sources into the program. Ctrl + L &#8220;links&#8221; items to some accounting software or spreadsheets. It NO LONGER links the expenses into Form 990 as of the 2009 + 2010 Form 990 which makes entering the information time consuming and frustrating! Even the linkage to the Revenue side has problems as some revenue items are shown as &#8220;Negative&#8221; (this is obvious as Revenue items in accounting software are coded as &#8220;credits&#8221;). It worked well up to the 2008 return but then it all changed in 2009!</p>
<p>4. It does NOT support Consolidated returns nor does it support Form 1040NR entry for &#8220;Estate/Trust&#8221; option/calculations. Ok&#8230; the latter is probably rare (but does happen like it did for me!) but why does Proseries NOT support CONSOLIDATED RETURNS?!<br />
- Some small companies DO file consolidated returns!!</p>
<p>5. It does Not offer the ability to truncate client&#8217;s personal information when printing a return by paper/pdf copy.</p>
<p>6. Print to pdf feature is nearly useless. No features included to encrypt the return or to truncate certain information like the taxpayer&#8217;s SS#. Can&#8217;t even link it to an email program to include as an attachment!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>If I had relatively &#8220;simple&#8221; returns, I would consider buying Proseries again but NOT if I have to prepare:<br />
1) Consolidated corp. returns<br />
2) Non-profit returns<br />
3) clients with foreign accounts due to the foreign reporting forms requirements.<br />
- The IRS has started to go after and/or audit taxpayers for the FBAR/foreign reporting form requirements!!<br />
- It would be nice to have those forms available in the 1040 or 1120/S or 1065 sections.</p>
<p>ProSeries is meant for the &#8220;smaller&#8221;, if not &#8220;simpler&#8221;, tax practitioners who has &#8220;simple&#8221; clients as it can&#8217;t handle the complex clients! ProSeries KILLED itself by NOT including a more comprehensive library of tax forms as the tax world is getting more and more complex every year due to the ever changing tax laws. The company will find itself catering to the &#8220;simpleton&#8221; tax practitioners and will be left behind as their competitors&#8217; tax software can handle those complex issues that ProSeries can not!</p>
<p>Take a look at the ProSeries Tech Support Forum and you&#8217;ll discover a lot of issues that people have with ProSeries <img src='http://cpa-connecticut.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s too bad because the software WAS pretty good but my clientele got complicated and I needed tax software that&#8217;s able to deal with the more complex tax filing requirements which ProSeries can NOT handle!</p>
<p>The company REFUSED to listen for MANY years in adding those forms. It sold itself on its &#8220;user friendly interface&#8221; and &#8220;simple to use&#8221; features. Too bad the company does NOT listen to its customers (read their tech forum!) and grow it&#8217;s software library and features!</p>
<p>It was time to say &#8220;Good Bye!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant Welcomes All Accounting, QuickBooks, and Tax Comments and Questions Right Here Under &#8220;Comments&#8221;. by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351&#038;cpage=1#comment-5745</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=351#comment-5745</guid>
		<description>There are too many unspecified details preventing a definitive answer.  I suggest you engage a competent CPA to consult with.  Of course, you may engage me if you wish.

In general, if the temporary assignment is contracted for one year or less, then it constitutes temporary work; consequently, your travel expenses would be deductible as such.  However, if your assignment or job is indefinite, the location of the assignment or job becomes your new tax home and you cannot deduct your travel expenses while there. An assignment or job in a single location is considered indefinite if it is realistically expected to last for more than one year, whether or not it actually lasts for more than one year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are too many unspecified details preventing a definitive answer.  I suggest you engage a competent CPA to consult with.  Of course, you may engage me if you wish.</p>
<p>In general, if the temporary assignment is contracted for one year or less, then it constitutes temporary work; consequently, your travel expenses would be deductible as such.  However, if your assignment or job is indefinite, the location of the assignment or job becomes your new tax home and you cannot deduct your travel expenses while there. An assignment or job in a single location is considered indefinite if it is realistically expected to last for more than one year, whether or not it actually lasts for more than one year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barefoot Accountant interviews Connecticut&#8217;s Democratic candidate for the United States Senate, Susan Bysiewicz.  Video and transcript of interview, Part I:  How the government can create jobs by William Brighenti</title>
		<link>http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4108&#038;cpage=1#comment-5744</link>
		<dc:creator>William Brighenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpa-connecticut.com/blog/?p=4108#comment-5744</guid>
		<description>You are preaching to the choir with your comment.  I agree totally.  The reason that municipalities are going broke in Connecticut is because of the municipal and state employees unions with their ridiculous pension and medical benefit plans.  Firemen can retire after 20 years making 85% of their highest salaries over the last five years:  they typically work enormous overtime during those years, boosting their retirement benefits.  The result:  our Connecticut governments are going broke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are preaching to the choir with your comment.  I agree totally.  The reason that municipalities are going broke in Connecticut is because of the municipal and state employees unions with their ridiculous pension and medical benefit plans.  Firemen can retire after 20 years making 85% of their highest salaries over the last five years:  they typically work enormous overtime during those years, boosting their retirement benefits.  The result:  our Connecticut governments are going broke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

