The Barefoot Accountant interviews Connecticut’s Democratic candidate for the United States Senate, Susan Bysiewicz. Video and transcript of interview, Part I: How the government can create jobs

William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant,Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor Accountants CPA Hartford, LLCAn exclusive interview of Susan Bysiewicz, former Secretary of State of Connecticut and Connecticut State Representative, by the Barefoot Accountant on August 5, 2011. Susan Bysiewicz is now running in the Democratic primary for United States Senator from Connecticut.

Barefoot Accountant: Hi, Susan. I appreciate you taking the time today to allow me to interview you.

Susan Bysiewicz: Thanks for doing this with me. I appreciate the opportunity.

Barefoot Accountant: I am a certified public accountant operating a small public accounting practice in Berlin, Connecticut. I would like to ask you a series of questions dealing with pocketbook issues of Connecticut residents. I have witnessed a lot of pain preparing tax returns and financial statements of small businesses and tax returns of individuals. So I have tried to focus my questions on the pocketbook issues facing working class and middle class people, and I would like to present them to you today, and I appreciate you taking the time from your busy schedule today to address them.

The first question I have concerns the unemployment rate. The unemployment rate has dropped one-tenth of one percent down to 9.1%, but it is still officially at 9.1. However, according to Morton Zuckerman of U.S. News and World Report, he has mentioned that the real unemployment rate is approaching 20%. I agree. And as you know, people fall off unemployment after so much time, and a lot of people are underemployed.

I would like to ask you, how do you propose to create jobs in America now if you are elected Senator of Connecticut?

Susan Bysiewicz: Well, first of all let me just say a few things about the unemployment numbers in Connecticut because this goes to your bigger question of how are we going to create jobs.

And, yes, you see unemployment hovering at around nine percent but I do believe in parts of Connecticut that rate is higher. In Windham County, for instance, people in Eastern Connecticut are struggling and the unemployment rates there are higher than nine percent. And I think there are many people who had been unemployed for so long they just given up. So I couldn’t dispute the numbers U.S. News and World Report had given because I have been all over the state visiting with people who are getting very, very discouraged.

And what I know is this: that we have made some progress in getting jobs back. We lost approximately a hundred and thirty thousand jobs during the recession. We have ninety thousand that we have to get back. Forty thousand we grew. And so it would not surprise me to have more than a hundred thousand people looking for jobs. And those numbers don’t include the thousands of young people who are graduating from high school and college who are looking for work.

And if you are working on a Senate campaign as I am, it’s great having interns who are willing to volunteer for free. And I know of a lot of young people, since I have three teenagers who are done with college and who are volunteering or out very actively looking for work and having a very difficult time.

And I’m running for the Senate because I’d like to make this state a place where we are growing job opportunities for everyone and we’re able to keep our young people here.
Right now that’s not happening. We’re continuing to lose more young people between eighteen and thirty five than any state in the country.

So your question about how we’re going to create jobs is really, really important and I would like to share with you some of the things that I think the federal government could be doing to help grow jobs in Connecticut and in our country.

And I would highlight just at the outset on that point, that government doesn’t create jobs; it’s businesses that create jobs but there are some things that the federal government could do to help job creation.

And first and foremost we could be investing in infrastructure in this country and rebuilding roads and bridges, and we could be investing in high-speed rail and transit systems that would make economic development in our state much more vibrant. Right now Connecticut has crumbling roads and bridges, many of them have not been repaired work or fixed well since President Eisenhower built the highway system. And I look at other states like New Jersey and New York: they’re very densely populated states that have much more sophisticated public transportation systems than we do.

So I think that we missed an opportunity during the recovery period when President Obama.helped to pass the Recovery Act. There was some investment in Connecticut infrastructure but not enough to make a real impact to grow good jobs.

Also I think the government has a really strong role to play in terms of funding research and innovation. And if we were investing more in basic scientific research and encouraging innovation, we would be helping to grow jobs in Connecticut and in our country. We have some really great colleges and universities, both public and private, and to the extent that there are more grants given at those public and private universities to do scientific research, that will grow jobs in the future.

And the third thing that I would mention that is really key is getting a national energy policy for our country so that we can be growing green jobs not only in Connecticut but across our country. And that would also protect the environment and make our country safer.

The other point that I would make on job creation is the key to job creation in Connecticut and all across our country has been this: that small businesses have created the lion share of the new jobs. And we can quibble about the statistics. Some statistics say sixty six percent of the new jobs come from small businesses; others say ninety percent.

That’s my passion. My passion as Secretary of State for twelve years and my passion as someone who would like to serve in the United States Senate is to look for ways to support small businesses, to reduce some of the challenges that they face, because in the end, the lion’s share of the jobs have come from small businesses. And Washington just hasn’t gotten the job done with respect to small businesses.

[End of Part I of interview with Susan Bysiewicz.]

Click the following link for Part II of the Barefoot Accountant’s interview of Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Democratic candidate for the United States Senate: Fair Trade Agreements; Corporate Taxes; Repatriation of Corporate Profits; Corporate Control of Government; Clean Elections Law.

The Barefoot Accountant

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Sign the petition to draft Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont to run for President in 2012 and challenge Barack Obama from the left.

Ralph Nader announced recently that a noted personality would be challenging Barack Obama from the left in the Presidential election of 2012. Reading that on the internet caused me to consider who would be the best possible Presidential candidate to challenge Barack Obama in order to shift the political spectrum back to the left.

Over the past couple of years, Republicans have moved to the extreme right on the political spectrum, allowing President Obama to inch over to the right of center for political advantage. Progressives need a choice to Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. There has been consistently one champion for all Progressives since Obama assumed office as president, and that champion has been Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont.

Please sign the petition to urge Senator Bernie Sanders to run for President. The future of the middle class and your children depends upon it. To sign the petition, simply enter your name, address, and email address in the comment box below.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Firedoglake is as bad as MSNBC when it comes to “editing” material on its website

William Brighenti, Certified Public Accountant,Certified QuickBooks ProAdvisor Accountants CPA Hartford, LLCI attempted on three occasions to point out the hypocrisy and bigotry of Al Sharpton’s recent remark that he would never criticize President Barack Obama because he was black.  I also pointed out that Sharpton’s bigotry in the past included Jews (calling them “diamond merchants”), Greeks and gays (calling Greek philosophers “homos”), Mormons (characterizing them as nonbelievers), and Caucasians (falsely accusing six white men of raping a young black woman, Tawana Brawley).

The editors of firedoglake.com refused to publish my blog entry on the grounds that it was inflammatory and lacked a syllogistic argument, even though Al Sharpton’s controversial remarks have been widely published elsewhere and the fact that their utterances have been confirmed by the press obviates any need for further confirmation or proof of their veracity.

Regarding the editors charge of being inflammatory, what is more inflammatory:  my reporting on and satirizing the bigotry or Sharpton uttering the bigoted statements in the first place!  I agree that Sharpton’s utterances are indeed inflammatory.  That’s what prompted me to list all of the bigoted statements that he made over time so as to question the choice by MSNBC TV of Al Sharpton to be its political commentator on prime time at 6 PM every evening.  Who’s next on the line up to host a news show on MSNBC … the Reverend Jeremiah Wright?

It makes me wonder if Phil Griffin and Comcast and GE now control firedoglake.   Or did it simply make a deal with MSNBC similar to the one Al Sharpton made that got him that 6 PM news slot on MSNBC TV?

Incidentally, for all of you incensed about Cenk Uygur being removed off the air and replaced by Al Sharpton, please petition Phil Griffin by clicking Bring Back Cenk Uygur to MSNBC TV, selecting “Sign Petition, and entering name, address, and email address.

The Barefoot Accountant

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Petition Mayor Adam Salina of Berlin, Connecticut to stop raising property taxes

The taxpayers of Berlin, Connecticut cannot afford another increase in property taxes. We, the undersigned taxpayers, petition you to hold the line on property taxes and not to increase property taxes as long as unemployment remains above 5% in our country.

It is time to exercise fiscal restraint. No more increases in property taxes until or unless our economy recovers. Many of your citizens are suffering severe economic hardships, including the loss of jobs and homes, if not bankruptcy.

Please stop raising property taxes in Berlin, Connecticut. Property taxes are a regressive form of taxation; consequently, we need you to protect the wallets of the middle class citizens of Berlin, Connecticut by opposing any further increases in property taxes.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Bring back Cenk Uygur to the daily MSNBC TV 6 PM hour. Petition Phil Griffin of MSNBC.

Phil Griffin, CEO of MSNBC TVCenk Uygur challenged the control of government by the establishment: i.e., by the large, multinational corporations and their principals. Because Cenk Uygur attacked the establishment, he was ostracized from the mainstream media. It is important to bring back Cenk Uygur to MSNBC TV so that MSNBC TV has at least one free voice speaking the truth to the American public.

The Reverend Al Sharpton has replaced Cenk Uygur at 6 PM EST on MSNBC TV. In comparison to Cenk, Al Sharpton is a disappointment as a political analyst. For starters, he declared in a recent Leslie Stahl interview on 60 Minutes that he would never criticize President Barack Obama because he is black. Is that not a rascist remark? Is it not ironic, if not hypocritical, for a civil rights leader to utter such a statement? Is this the appropriate posture for a political commentator? Is it objective to side with a politician strictly on the basis of race? Should not the purpose of a political news show be truth telling and challenging the government?

Secondly, in my opinion, the Reverend Al Sharpton is not an eloquent speaker. At times his syntax seems discombobulated and his enunciation incomprehensible, leaving me with the impression that he may not have command of the English language. Often I wonder if I am listening to a bible-thumping minister rather than a journalist. I do not believe that Professor Higgins would have any difficulty identifying his geographical origins from his speech.

Lastly, Al Sharpton, though perhaps street-wise, does not impress me as having the appropriate contextual legal and economic knowledge to adequately challenge his astute, polished, well-scripted and rehearsed political guests on the show. Recall that Cenk Uygur holds a law degree from Columbia and a business degree from Wharton; consequently, he possesses the requisite understanding to delve into the intricacies of law and government involving the economy and taxation, the bread and butter issues of working and middle class Americans.

Al Sharpton, on the other hand, dropped out of Brooklyn College. Although he possesses a solid background in civil rights issues, given what I have heard over the past couple of weeks on MSNBC TV, I do not believe that he has the required detailed understanding of law and economics and taxation to address his guests in as successfully a challenging manner as Cenk, who scored many hits in exposing the weaknesses and fallacies of the arguments of his guests. In my opinion, Cenk cross-examined his political pundits with the skill of a prosecuting attorney. Al, on the other hand, sort of pounds his guests with the fervor of an evangelist in a preachy fire-and-brimstone, huff-and-puff manner, at times appearing not to truly listen in detail to the statements and responses of his guests, and consequently, failing to respond in point-by-point fashion to them in order to expose their weaknesses.

For all of the above reasons and others (I also liked Cenk’s playful manner and sense of humor), I want Cenk Uygur back at 6 PM EST on MSNBC TV. I can no longer endure watching and listening to the Reverend Al Sharpton on MSNBC TV at the 6 PM news hour. If you feel similarly, please join with me in informing Phil Griffin and MSNBC TV that unless they bring back Cenk Uygur on the 6 PM show, or on an equivalent evening hourly program, and own up to having exerted pressure on Cenk and other program hosts not to challenge the powers of the “establishment”, that you intend to boycott the network, too.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , | 10 Comments

Did the Hartford Courant’s recent report on the effects of the Connecticut income tax miss the point?

Mara Lee, Business Reporter, Hartford Courant

Mara Lee

On July 27, 2011, the Hartford Courant published an article, “Next Week’s State Income Tax Bite? Not So Big For Most Workers”, written by Mara Lee, a business reporter on its staff. In that article, Mara Lee remarks that the state income tax is higher on people with higher incomes, reporting that it will not hurt the bottom half of workers and most retirees. However, what is disturbing to me is the impression that her article leaves with the reader:  that is, any criticism of the new tax bill on the grounds that it fails to spread fairly the tax burden on all groups is unfounded and mere class warfare.

Unfortunately, Mara Lee and Peter Brown, assistant director for Quinnipiac University’s Polling Institute, whom Mara Lee quotes in her article, miss what the public has not: that the super rich, as always, got off very lightly with this new tax law.

Of all the individuals, those with Connecticut taxable incomes of $500,000 are hurt the most by the new tax law. However, all those S&P CEOs in Fairfield County, who earn on average $9 million annually, were given a pass. Let’s run some numbers to illustrate.

Assume a physician or an attorney practicing in Connecticut has taxable income of $500,000. Under the previous tax bill, this individual’s tax liability would have been $24,800; however, under the new tax bill, this individual’s tax liablity would now be $31,050, representing a 25.2% increase in taxes.

Connecticut Income Tax on Middle Class

Now let us examine the effect of the new tax bill, Senate Bill No. 1239, on the Connecticut income tax liability of the average $9,000,000 salary of an S&P CEO, a number of whom live in Fairfield County, Governor Dannel Malloy’s home territory. Although this individual’s state income taxes would increase $23,250 over that under the previous tax rates, percentage-wise it is a modest 4.03% increase in taxes: a percentage increase 20.9% less than that born by the middle-class professional citizen.

Connecticut Income Tax Laibility on S&P CEO

The article’s suggestion that Senate Bill No. 1239, Governor Dannel Malloy’s recent tax bill, is fairly progressive, equitably increasing taxes on the wealthy, misrepresents the actual nature of the bill: it unjustly favors the wealthiest citizens in Connecticut, targeting the middle and upper middle classes in Connecticut, as clearly evident in these two examples.

One can only wonder if Mara Lee bothered to read Senate Bill No. 1239 and investigate the tax effects of the tax bill on the various economic classes since she failed to mention the material discrepancy in tax rate increments between those individuals with taxable incomes of $500,000 per year and those with taxable incomes of $9,000,000.

If you, too, wish to see the wealthy, the super rich, the Wall Street barons who caused the collapse of our economy in 2008 and stole trillions without one being convicted and sentenced for the crime of the millenium, then sign the petition below to raise their taxes.

Change.org|Start an Online Petition »


The Barefoot Accountant

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Black Princeton University Professor Cornel West calls President Barack Obama the black mascot of Wall Street


On the MSNBC show, “A Stronger America”, hosted by Ed Schultz, Black Princeton University Professor Cornel West calls President Barack Obama another black mascot of Wall Street. The Reverend Al Sharpton unsuccessfully rebuts Cornel West’s characterization of the Wall Street President.

President Barack Obama is indeed a very Wall Street President, not unlike Bill Clinton and several others. Timothy Geithner, Larry Summers, et al are Wall Streeters, and they were his chief economic advisors. Is it inconceivable that race was used in politics to advance a political agenda? Is it inconceivable that Obama was used as a Judas Goat by Wall Street to advance its own agenda? Did not Wall Street “hire” a “B” actor in 1980 to advance the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of our country?

Coming up as the next Wall Street mascot, of course, will be the first female President, Michele Bachmann, eliminating corporate income taxes. Again, the establishment controls the government and its players, and it gives us personalities and actors to read its scripts, utter its propaganda, and promote its agenda.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Cenk Uygur on what MSNBC really offered & What’s Next

Cenk Uygur joins the Majority Report to speak in detail with Sam Seder and answer questions by listeners concerning his departure from MSNBC and what’s next.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Free Press?! Cenk Uygur leaves MSNBC over political disagreements – RT 110722

Real issues ignored as mainstream floats on tip of tabloid iceberg. Yellow journalism.

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged | Leave a comment

Cenk Uygur – Truth About Why He Left MSNBC (25-Jul-11)(POLITICS, MEDIA & SOCIETY series)

Posted in Accountants CPA Hartford, Articles | Tagged , | Leave a comment